#xa0; 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the duty to assess the “substantial regularity” of the transaction was not provided by the law, was not foreseeable and imposed on them an excessive burden

Both applicant companies complain under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that they were made to bear the burden of the unlawful actions of public authorities.

, it imposed a moral burden to judge the innocence or guilt of a person.

It had been wrong and disproportionate of the enforcement courts to   place a burden on it to prove that the debtor had not settled the applicant company’s debt.

It also concluded that the applicant’s ex-wife nonetheless had to bear a significantly larger financial burden in the upbringing of their children.

An excessive burden had therefore been placed on him and the balance between his rights and the general interest had been upset.

In particular, did the interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare   Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?

choices which had to be made in terms of priorities and resources, any obligations arising under that provision had to be interpreted in a way which did not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden

In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?   5.

If so, was that interference in accordance with the conditions provided for by law and did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant?   2.

possession of supporting documents from the applicant about his family’s financial situation, the court held that the security deposit, which represented 10% of the debt, did not represent an excessive burden

In particular, did the applicant have to bear an “individual and excessive burden” within the meaning of that provision, as a result of the registration of S.’s title to land in respect of which the applicant

to the Convention, the applicant complains that the sanction imposed on him, namely the confiscation of his vehicle in addition to the fine, was a disproportionate measure which imposed an excessive burden

Did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1 (see Immobiliare Saffi v.

If the deprivation was lawful, did that deprivation impose and excessive burden on the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis, Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999 ‑ V)?

If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company?    

Has the interference been in the public interest, in accordance with the conditions provided for by law and did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company (see Immobiliare Saffi

In particular, did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V?   2.