CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

42 695 résultats pour « Alefeld »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-632791-638245

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2002

11 octobre 2002

  The applicants consider that the Moldovan authorities are responsible under the Convention for the alleged violations of their Convention rights since they have not taken adequate measures to stop

Source officielle

Page 25 sur 2135

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7524

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2013

5 mars 2013

In addition, the Court noted that under its case-law on Article   13, the right to an effective remedy in respect of an alleged violation of a Convention right by a last-instance judicial authority

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202685

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2020

6 avril 2020

2020   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 73944/14 Yuriy Yakovlevich STESHENKO against Ukraine lodged on 19 November 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application mainly concerns the applicant’s alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192869

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2019

3 avril 2019

Lastly, they also concern the complaint under Article 6 §§1 and 3 (b) of the Convention concerning the trial court’s alleged failure to specify the documents on the basis of which it asked the applicants

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187177

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2018

24 septembre 2018

  Azerbaijan , nos. 67360/11 and 2 others, 11 February 2016) and the authorities’ alleged failure to notify him of the hearing held on 19   September 2006 in which he was convicted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179390

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2017

13 novembre 2017

The articles covered a story regarding an alleged kidnapping in the Chechen Republic of a Mr P., purportedly a friend of Mr K.’s father.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221878

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2022

22 novembre 2022

The applicant alleged in the civil proceedings against the publishing company that he had nothing to do with the accusations, that the journalist had mistaken the identity of the alleged fraudster and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10666

Admin. suprême

23 juillet 2015

23 juillet 2015

The first applicant alleged that he had been beaten one night by nurses and patients.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219085

Admin. suprême

14 juillet 2022

14 juillet 2022

The applicants alleged under Article 6 of the Convention that their right to a fair hearing was violated by the national courts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-152789

Admin. suprême

9 février 2015

9 février 2015

On 21 September 2012 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against the State before the Zagreb Municipal Civil Court ( Općinski građanski sud u Zagrebu ) claiming damages for his alleged ill-treatment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1336

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2009

29 septembre 2009

.) - 18324/04 Decision 29.9.2009 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for home Respect for private life Alleged nuisance caused by opening of dental surgery in a residential block of flats: inadmissible

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217571

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2022

3 mai 2022

no. 55294/17 Virgilia CĂLDĂRARI and Lilian CĂLDĂRARI against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 21 July 2017 communicated on 3 May 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a case of alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1024DEC001337807

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2019

24 octobre 2019

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and (c) of the Convention, concerning his right to have practical and effective legal assistance and the authorities’ alleged failure to notify

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244824

Admin. suprême

12 août 2025

12 août 2025

27380/23 Tiberiu MATKO against Romania lodged on 29 June 2023 communicated on 12 August 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the death of the applicant’s father as a result of an alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215661

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2022

17 janvier 2022

Dohuk Iraqi 1986   A.M. 2012 Dohuk Iraqi Barbara POHÁRNOK Tompa transit zone 30/03/2017 – 26/07/2017 Alleged victim of domestic violence   Alleged victim of domestic violence Food allergy 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-186365

Admin. suprême

27 août 2018

27 août 2018

prejudice to the applicant’s right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article   6 § 3 (b) due to alleged non-communication of the reasoned judgment of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-235483

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2024

10 juillet 2024

The applicant further complains about the alleged presence of male prison officers in several of the medical procedures at issue, during some of which she was allegedly forced to remain handcuffed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249005

Admin. suprême

5 février 2026

5 février 2026

breach of   the principle of equality of arms in civil defamation proceedings and the alleged failure of a domestic court to protect the applicant’s right to reputation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224538

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2023

4 avril 2023

courts had examined his case in summary proceedings and therefore convicted him on the basis of the evidence collected by the investigating authorities without hearing witnesses or the victim of the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205372

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2020

23 septembre 2020

The case also concerns the alleged lack of justification of his pre-trial detention, the alleged lack of an effective procedure to review the lawfulness of his detention, and the alleged lack of an enforceable

Source officielle