CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

2 715 résultats pour « Bekens JOSEPH »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC004564308

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2014

6 mai 2014

THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 45643/08 Svetozar PEROVIĆ against Serbia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 6   May   2014 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421DEC002693906

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2015

21 avril 2015

The Court is not convinced by the applicant’s argument that the length factor had been of minor importance in the suspension of the sentence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204DEC001837510

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2012

4 décembre 2012

In reply to the invitation to submit comments, the applicant’s representative informed the Court on 25 October 2012 that she had not been able to contact the applicant. 8.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68347-68815

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2001

17 juillet 2001

There had therefore been a violation of Article 2 on that account.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3100828-3440460

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2010

20 avril 2010

arbitrary as there had been no medical opinion stating that it was necessary.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1528864-1603956

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2005

6 décembre 2005

Since 1993 he has been a member of the Milan Public Prosecutor’s Office.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1110DEC003012318

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2021

10 novembre 2021

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 30123/18 Michael Joseph

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0402DEC000309808

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2013

2 avril 2013

  Joseph hospital and received medication with antipsychotics. 10.     On 7 February 2002 the applicant was released from the closed ward of the St.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD000450306

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2012

29 mai 2012

Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Josep Casadevall, President,   Alvina Gyulumyan,   Egbert Myjer,   Ján Šikuta,  

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-524107-525567

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2002

26 mars 2002

  He   alleged, in particular, that his remand in custody from 30 November to 8 December 1997, and from 31 December 1997 to 8 January 1998, had been unlawful, that he had not been able to take

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2715295-2963310

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2009

21 avril 2009

release had been ordered, that the examination of the lawfulness of his detention had taken too long and that his telephone calls had been monitored.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-559149-561212

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2002

28 mai 2002

received had it been possible to perform the contract signed with the American corporation, less the amount paid him by the ministry on pre-emption of the sale, plus interest.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2950975-3247570

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2009

1 décembre 2009

There had therefore been a breach of his right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0203DEC006346909

Admin. suprême

3 février 2015

3 février 2015

complied with, and that it has been lifted on 16 January 2012, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0718JUD002886703

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2006

18 juillet 2006

The property had been vacant for six months and the previous tenant had been Anita or Joseph De La Cruz. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC002378507

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2012

4 janvier 2012

There had been several increases in permissible rent levels and other measures had been taken with a view to resolving the issue. 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC004110207

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2009

24 mars 2009

The Court of Appeal, which found that the second applicant had not been able to prove its objections, found that the summons to appear before the District Court had been correctly served and upheld the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0320DEC003284607

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2012

20 mars 2012

Moreover, Z. had not been correctly valued because an unfinished building belonging to it had not been reflected in the valuation.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68074-68542

Admin. suprême

31 août 1999

31 août 1999

  Complaints     The applicant company complains that its right to freedom of expression guaranteed under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights has been breached.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004DEC005760209

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2011

4 octobre 2011

, has been violated.

Source officielle

Page 25 sur 136

← PrécédentSuivant →