AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220246
30 septembre 2022
30 septembre 2022
between both expert reports, that is, an annual market rent of EUR 10,300, and the EUR 188 annual rent he was actually perceiving, it found that the applicant had been suffering a disproportionate burden
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-768
20 octobre 2010
20 octobre 2010
There was no evidence that the amount of the fines had constituted a substantial economic burden.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225870
15 juin 2023
15 juin 2023
1, and did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242641
6 mars 2025
6 mars 2025
Has that interference been in the public interest, in accordance with the conditions provided for by law and did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant within the meaning of Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223907
2 mars 2023
2 mars 2023
Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Khoniakina v. Georgia , no. 17767/08, § 72, 19 June 2012)? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3181
26 septembre 2006
26 septembre 2006
premises had been requisitioned for almost 65 years, the restrictions on their rights as landlords and the absence of sufficient procedural safeguards, the Court held that a disproportionate and excessive burden
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212913
5 octobre 2021
5 octobre 2021
Was the interference reasonably proportionate to the aim sought to be realised, or did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Béláné Nagy v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228252
20 septembre 2023
20 septembre 2023
Did the deprivation of property in the present case impose an excessive and individual burden on the applicants (see, mutatis mutandis , Muharrem Güneş and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244395
1 juillet 2025
1 juillet 2025
If so, did the deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216660
2 mars 2022
2 mars 2022
In particular, as a result of the judgments adopted, did the applicant company have to bear “an individual and excessive burden” within the meaning of that provision (see Lekić v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218012
24 mai 2022
24 mai 2022
Turkey , no. 28241/18, §§ 89 et seq. , 13 July 2021) Were the applicants subjected to “an individual and excessive burden”, within the meaning of that provision, as a result of their inability
Source officiellePRESIDENT DE LA SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX
CETAT:CETATEXT000007880733
3 mai 1995
3 mai 1995
reconduite à la frontière, l'arrêté du préfet de la Seine Saint-Denis en date du 5 novembre 1993 n'a pas porté aux droits de l'intéressé et au respect de sa vie familiale une atteinte disproportionnée aux butsen
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235152
19 juin 2024
19 juin 2024
(b) Did the interference in the present case impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Džinić v. Croatia , no. 38359/13, §§ 67-69, 17 May 2016)?
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10077
30 septembre 2014
30 septembre 2014
preliminary inquiry to establish in detail the exact circumstances of the incident and to account in full for the use of force of the extent and type alleged, the Government had failed to discharge the burden
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4116
2 novembre 2004
2 novembre 2004
of Protocol No. 1 – The quashing of the final judgment in the applicant’s favour had constituted a deprivation of property and had upset the fair balance, imposing on him an individual and excessive burden
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200281
12 décembre 2019
12 décembre 2019
Moreover, did that interference impose an excessive and individual burden on the applicant (compare Koufaki and Adedy v. Greece (dec.), nos. 57665/12 and 57657/12, 7 May 2013)? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226296
11 juillet 2023
11 juillet 2023
Did the interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see, for a summary of the relevant general principles, Broniowski v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC006368611
7 mai 2025
7 mai 2025
1 to the Convention that the award of compensation corresponding to 50% of the property’s market value according to Section 8 (2) of Bolzano Provincial Law no. 10/1991 imposed an excessive burden
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0412DEC002504094
12 avril 1996
12 avril 1996
This was an unjustified and excessive burden taking into account that the distance between Altenbeken and Paderborn city was only about 12 km.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205767
9 octobre 2020
9 octobre 2020
He argued that he was suffering a disproportionate burden given the low amount of rent being received for the commercial premises at issue when compared to the real rental value of the property.
Source officiellePage 25 sur 375