CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0516JUD000982513

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2019

16 mai 2019

It was unclear how and by what means those judges would have been put in such a position, or indeed which judges would have been affected. Such findings had no legal basis.

Page 26 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD003234704

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2007

13 novembre 2007

    The applicant complained that the belated enforcement of the final judgment in her favour violated her right to have her civil rights determined by a court as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1203JUD003567197

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2002

3 décembre 2002

Real property belonging to persons who have illegally left the county or have failed to return within the statutory time-limit shall become the property of the Romanian State with no compensation whatsoever

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1012JUD002175915

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2017

12 octobre 2017

the fractured finger, could have been caused.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC000387714

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

He may have a few half wits as a following but I speak for the people that have known payam for several years and have been on the reciving end of his abuse a disrespect and his not such a nice person.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211JUD005960809

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2012

11 décembre 2012

This would never have happened because the new school would have been designed to work only with Romani students. C.     Individual situation of the applicants 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627DEC002780316

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2017

27 juin 2017

benefited unduly from the proceeds of his crime - had suffered confiscations of their property, could not be considered to have been arbitrary or to have upset the proportionality test under Article 1

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0427JUD000357109

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2017

27 avril 2017

    Those principles have been further clarified in the case of Schatschaschwili (see Schatschaschwili v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106DEC007620216

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2018

6 novembre 2018

Finally, if the answer to the first and second questions was yes, whether the trial judge would have been entitled to dismiss the claim for possession in this case, as he said he would have done. 15 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD003521497

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840691

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

Since 1974 both Famagusta and Trypimeni have been under Turkish military control. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108DEC002627908

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2013

8 janvier 2013

Furthermore, the domestic courts have accorded plaintiffs in similar cases the right to submit such claims against public enterprises (see paragraphs   15-18 above).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1115JUD001942115

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2018

15 novembre 2018

could have been caused by impact against a hard surface.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0517JUD001901716

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2018

17 mai 2018

It is not sufficient that the applicant may have unsuccessfully exercised another remedy which could have overturned the impugned measure on other grounds not connected with the complaint of a violation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103DEC003891405

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2011

3 novembre 2011

In 113 of the 131 cases decided so far in 2011, the proceedings before the Supreme Court have lasted less than six months and in 18 cases they have lasted not more than a year.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0303JUD002620604

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2026

3 mars 2026

Those decisions have not been challenged or quashed to date. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD006085815

Admin. suprême

4 février 2020

4 février 2020

In the case of Alexandru Marian Iancu v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0616DEC004308118

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2020

16 juin 2020

SECTION DECISION Application no. 43081/18 Joanna Ewa PRZYDATEK against Poland   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 16 June 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522DEC002702517

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2018

22 mai 2018

They could not have their own children. Their financial and housing situation was good.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228798

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2023

12 octobre 2023

    Have the applicant companies complied with the admissibility criteria set out in Article   35 of the Convention?   2.     In applications nos.

Source officielle