CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0516JUD000982513
16 mai 2019
It was unclear how and by what means those judges would have been put in such a position, or indeed which judges would have been affected. Such findings had no legal basis.
Page 26 sur 100
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD003234704
13 novembre 2007
The applicant complained that the belated enforcement of the final judgment in her favour violated her right to have her civil rights determined by a court as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1203JUD003567197
3 décembre 2002
Real property belonging to persons who have illegally left the county or have failed to return within the statutory time-limit shall become the property of the Romanian State with no compensation whatsoever
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1012JUD002175915
12 octobre 2017
the fractured finger, could have been caused.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC000387714
19 septembre 2017
He may have a few half wits as a following but I speak for the people that have known payam for several years and have been on the reciving end of his abuse a disrespect and his not such a nice person.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211JUD005960809
11 décembre 2012
This would never have happened because the new school would have been designed to work only with Romani students. C. Individual situation of the applicants 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627DEC002780316
27 juin 2017
benefited unduly from the proceeds of his crime - had suffered confiscations of their property, could not be considered to have been arbitrary or to have upset the proportionality test under Article 1
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0427JUD000357109
27 avril 2017
Those principles have been further clarified in the case of Schatschaschwili (see Schatschaschwili v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106DEC007620216
6 novembre 2018
Finally, if the answer to the first and second questions was yes, whether the trial judge would have been entitled to dismiss the claim for possession in this case, as he said he would have done. 15 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD003521497
22 septembre 2009
The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840691
27 janvier 2009
Since 1974 both Famagusta and Trypimeni have been under Turkish military control. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108DEC002627908
8 janvier 2013
Furthermore, the domestic courts have accorded plaintiffs in similar cases the right to submit such claims against public enterprises (see paragraphs 15-18 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1115JUD001942115
15 novembre 2018
could have been caused by impact against a hard surface.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0517JUD001901716
17 mai 2018
It is not sufficient that the applicant may have unsuccessfully exercised another remedy which could have overturned the impugned measure on other grounds not connected with the complaint of a violation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103DEC003891405
3 novembre 2011
In 113 of the 131 cases decided so far in 2011, the proceedings before the Supreme Court have lasted less than six months and in 18 cases they have lasted not more than a year.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0303JUD002620604
3 mars 2026
Those decisions have not been challenged or quashed to date. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD006085815
4 février 2020
In the case of Alexandru Marian Iancu v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0616DEC004308118
16 juin 2020
SECTION DECISION Application no. 43081/18 Joanna Ewa PRZYDATEK against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 16 June 2020 as a Committee composed of: Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522DEC002702517
22 mai 2018
They could not have their own children. Their financial and housing situation was good.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228798
12 octobre 2023
Have the applicant companies complied with the admissibility criteria set out in Article 35 of the Convention? 2. In applications nos.