Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206JUD003224707
6 décembre 2011
6 décembre 2011
Chamber had not been informed of this within the ten-day time-limit provided for by the law. 7.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2222571-2379711
8 janvier 2008
8 janvier 2008
Furthermore, Ms Özdemir’s version of events had been consistent and her allegations, although denied, had not been challenged by the Government.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68448-68916
8 décembre 1999
8 décembre 1999
The Court noted the radical nature of the interference in issue: ÖZDEP had been definitively dissolved with immediate effect, its assets had been liquidated and transferred ipso iure to the Treasury
Source officiellePRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3166834-3541692
25 juin 2010
25 juin 2010
from the date on which the final decision had been taken by the domestic courts.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2506101-2714054
7 octobre 2008
7 octobre 2008
Judgment was given by a Chamber of seven judges, composed as follows: Josep Casadevall (Andorran), President , Corneliu Bîrsan (Romanian), Boštjan M.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3061163-3386176
23 mars 2010
23 mars 2010
On 27 January 2009 the Chamber to which the case had been allocated relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber, under Article 30 1 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0213DEC002149802
13 février 2007
13 février 2007
Finally, under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 he stated that he had been entitled to retain possession of the goods and the vehicle and that the confiscation had been disproportionate.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0504DEC003949207
4 mai 2010
4 mai 2010
Article 14(6) provides: When a person has by a final decision been convicted of a criminal offence and when subsequently his conviction has been reversed or he has been pardoned on the ground that a new
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1654909-1734057
25 avril 2006
25 avril 2006
Furthermore, although the penalty imposed on Mr Stoll had not been very harsh, the Court reiterated that what mattered was not that he had been sentenced to a minor penalty, but that he had been
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3149870-3496721
1 juin 2010
1 juin 2010
convicted despite having been neither the author of the article nor the owner of the newspaper.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3049257-3368600
9 mars 2010
9 mars 2010
He had never been formally tried in court but every third month during his detention there had been a sort of religious trial where he had been put before a priest who had decided on his continued imprisonment
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1051981-1088874
20 juillet 2004
20 juillet 2004
The article had found that the article indicated that the judge had been responsible for the judgment, whereas it had been adopted by a panel of three judges.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126DEC001628703
26 janvier 2010
26 janvier 2010
examined on the merits and had not been annulled.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0121DEC002685011
21 janvier 2014
21 janvier 2014
heard or if he or she has been acquitted by the lower court. 19.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2727843-2985700
12 mai 2009
12 mai 2009
Mr Korelc, however, had not submitted that his relationship had been of a homosexual nature. Nor had he asserted that he had been discriminated against on the ground of his sexual orientation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0407DEC002655502
7 avril 2009
7 avril 2009
The court noted that the applicant had been in the remand prison between 30 September 1994 and 14 March 2000.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0303JUD000119308
3 mars 2015
3 mars 2015
According to the Court’s case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and are
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-558306-560366
29 mai 2002
29 mai 2002
The cases Polacek v. the Czech Republic (application no. 38645/97) and Gratzinger v. the Czech Republic (no. 39794/98) concern applications brought by four United States nationals of Czech origin, Joseph
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622JUD002866205
22 juin 2010
22 juin 2010
The applicant alleged under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the length of the proceedings before the domestic courts to which he had been a party had been excessive.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211JUD003368205
11 février 2014
11 février 2014
The applicant complained in substance that his pre-trial detention had been excessively long and that the orders by which his pre-trial detention was extended had not been based on relevant
Source officiellePage 26 sur 136