In its Chamber judgment of 28 June 2005, the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

  Summary of the facts   Between 1993 and 1997 the applicant company held 49% of the shares in Sovtransavto–Lugansk, a Ukrainian public limited company.

That decision was declared null and void by the Ostrava Regional Court (krajský soud) , which held that the question of Alexander Blücher’s nationality was not relevant.

It held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 in respect of the first set of proceedings, but no violation in respect of the second.

On 13 September 2001, the Court held a hearing on the admissibility and merits of the application on which date the case was declared admissible.

forcible examination in a mental hospital; Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 3 November 1998; Whereas in its judgment of 5 July 1999 the Court unanimously: - held

  In its Chamber judgment of 20 December 2001 the Court held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 11 (right to association) in the case.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant 30,000 Lithuanian litai (LTL) for non-pecuniary damage and LTL 70,000 for costs and expenses

Pursuant to that provision, the Messina magistrate held that the accused had no case to answer.

He was held in detention until 20 September 1995 and questioned regularly about his links with the LTTE.

therapeutic treatment Article 3 Degrading treatment Structural problem resulting in detention for more than nine years in psychiatric wing of prison with no prospect of change or appropriate medical help

The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 (access to court) of the Convention. (The judgment is available only in French.)   (3)     Diaz Aparicio v.

        The Real Estate Court held an oral hearing, during which the parties were heard.

#Tagállami kötelezettségszegés - EK 49. cikk - Szociális biztonság - Másik tagállamban való ideiglenes tartózkodás alatt szükséges kórházi ellátások - Az illetékes intézmény a tartózkodási hely szerinti

#Appel – EF-varemærker – ordmærket HELLIM – indsigelse fra indehaveren af EF-ordmærket HALLOUMI – indsigelsen forkastet.#Sag C-393/12 P.

#Gemenskapsvarumärke - Invändningsförfarande - Underlåtelse att betala invändningsavgiften - Beslut som fastställer att någon invändning inte har framställts - Uppenbart att talan helt saknar rättslig

#Trade mark tal-Unjoni Ewropea – Proċedimenti ta’ oppożizzjoni – Annullament tat-trade mark figurattiva preċedenti li sservi ta’ bażi għad-deċiżjoni kkontestata – Ma hemmx lok li tingħata deċiżjoni.

The domestic courts held that the State was liable and awarded damages to the applicant.

The Court also held unanimously that there had been a breach of Mr Rushiti’s right to be presumed innocent as guaranteed by Article 6 § 2.