The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no.

The Government pleaded that the applicants had lost their victim status due to the fact that they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no.

The Government argued mainly that the applicant had lost his victim status for the detention between 27 February 2015 and 19 December 2019 because he had benefited from the remedy offered by Law no. 169

The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefited from the remedy offered by Law no.

He alleged that the humiliations he had been subjected to had affected him to such an extent that he had lost all capacity to overcome them psychologically, had lost his job as a result and had been under

290 of the Criminal Code); (3)     abusing his office by obtaining undue funds from N.C.C.O. in order to build a house for himself and accepting compensation exceeding what he had actually lost

The applicants’ claims were thus dismissed and as a result they lost around two-thirds (67%) of their pensions.

The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law   no.

In particular, the Court notes that: in applications nos. 79720/12 and 39902/15 , the applicants have lost their victim status, in so far as the outstanding judgments had been duly enforced and within

He lost consciousness and came around in the hospital. The hospital reported about the incident to the police.

lost valuable goods and possessions. o)     Adrian Moldovan The sixteenth applicant declares that his house was destroyed by fire, together with his hen-house, and that he lost valuable goods

The court ordered the seaport company to compensate the plaintiffs for lost earnings and non-pecuniary damage.

It submitted that it was not necessary for the applicant’s guilt to be proved for confidence to be lost and that “actions having characteristics of criminal activity” were sufficient.

In the applicant's case the domestic courts' findings were limited to the conclusion that under applicable domestic law the applicant had lost any legal entitlement to occupy the flat and that she therefore

The general interest in protecting her rights at that stage, therefore, had lost much of its importance.

After the first applicant lost his job, they returned to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and applied for asylum.

In 2000, his permit was lost or stolen.

The applicants sustained injuries and psychological trauma and some of them lost relatives. All of them had their flats and possessions flooded and destroyed.

In the instant case, the applicant lost his right to the social insurance benefits for veterans, but was still entitled to the ordinary retirement benefits according to the 1991 Act.