Czech Republic   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 4   February 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda, President,   Carlo Ranzoni,   Pauliine

Mahoney,   Pauliine Koskelo, judges, and Renata Degener, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 18 September 2014, Having regard to the declaration submitted by

réforme de la responsabilité élargie des producteurs, qui a créé dans le code de l'environnement un article R. 541-146 prévoyant que les équipements électriques et électroniques, à l'exception des lampes

against Finland   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 18   May 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Valeriu Griţco, President,   Branko Lubarda,   Pauliine

    The receiver, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam, appointed the Rotterdam lawyer Mr P. as his procurator litis ( procureur ). 12.

Lemmens,   Ganna Yudkivska,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Faris Vehabović,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc,   Carlo Ranzoni,   Pauliine Koskelo,   Georgios A.

Černiauskas, a lawyer practising in Kaunas. 3.     The Government were represented by their Agent, Ms K. Bubnytė-Širmenė.

Boboc’s father and his lawyer were also asked by the prosecution to reveal the applicant’s identity. 11 .

Hahmann, a lawyer practising in Vienna. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.

(a lawyer and politician active within Forza Italia ) involving Mr T., Mr D.U., colonel R., and a co-accused of Mr D.U.

Truc Lam NGUYEN ARRÊT :- contradictoire - rendu par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la Cour, les parties en ayant été préalablement avisées dans les conditions prévues au deuxième alinéa

  Pritchard, a lawyer practising in London. The United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms   A.

Gąsiorowska, a lawyer practising in Warsaw. 3.     The Polish Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the application. THE FACTS 4.

Horvat, a lawyer practising in Zagreb. The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.

There can thus be no doubt that the applicant’s right to continue to practise as a lawyer was at stake in the disciplinary proceedings.

Dangov, a lawyer of his own choosing (after 11 May 2007 the second applicant was represented by a different lawyer).

She stated that she had already contacted some lawyers who requested a deposit of 30,000 Czech korunas (CZK) (equivalent to 1,150 euros (EUR)).

In the case of La Paglia v. Italy, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mr   C.L. Rozakis , President ,   Mr   P.

; January 2018 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Guido Raimondi,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Armen Harutyunyan,   Pauliine