CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1109JUD003475397
9 novembre 2000
On 28 October 1994 the applicant, her parents and thirteen other persons living in the house lodged an action with the Bratislava I District Court ( Obvodný súd - “the District Court”) pursuant
Page 26 sur 71
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD003370714
10 avril 2018
On 28 March 2014 the Ostankinskiy District Court of Moscow (“the Ostankinskiy District Court”) further extended the applicant’s detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD004897409
30 mai 2017
On 20 February 2009 the Leninskiy District Court of Yaroslavl (“the District Court”) remanded the applicant in custody.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD005633700
15 février 2007
The [defendants'] case is [currently] being heard by the Vratza District Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121JUD006039915
21 novembre 2017
It also reproached the District Court for the inadequate way it had dealt with the mother’s procedural requests.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0514DEC004089498
14 mai 2002
:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 40894/98 by Phillip
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0605JUD000136307
5 juin 2014
On the latter date the Maribor District Court issued a decision dismissing the applicant’s claim. The applicant appealed. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0130JUD003474706
30 janvier 2014
On 25 September 2000 the Ljubljana District Court decided to open bankruptcy proceedings against D. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0322DEC003829215
22 mars 2016
The District Court added that, had it imposed a prison sentence, it would have sentenced the applicant to one month’s imprisonment. 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009DEC001354510
9 octobre 2012
On 31 August 2009 the District Court ordered the applicant to pay the claimant CHF 40,000 plus interest and costs.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0618JUD002565694
18 juin 2002
, Kulp District Governor 83.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1010JUD003628897
10 octobre 2006
What was at stake for the applicant also has to be taken into account (see Philis v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529JUD005418411
29 mai 2018
Le 22 octobre 2007, le tribunal du district Leninski de Vladikavkaz, en république d’Ossétie du Nord ‑ Alanie (« le tribunal du district »), rejeta ce recours.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD004624807
28 mars 2017
On 17 November 2008 the Sovetskiy District Court of Nizhniy Novgorod (“the District Court”) acknowledged a violation of the applicant’s right not to be subjected to treatment proscribed under
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1029JUD004211309
29 octobre 2019
On 12 October 2007 the Kuybyshevskiy District Court of Omsk (“the District Court”) heard the defamation case in the absence of the applicants and delivered a default judgment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0531JUD003858197
31 mai 2005
Thus, the District Court decided not to apply the new provision, and accordingly, not to consider the merits of the charges. 14.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194355
13 juin 2019
In particular, were the applicant’s arrest and detention during approximatively seven hours on 22 June 2017 at the Gazakh District Police Office in compliance with Article 5 § 1 of the Convention?
3ème chambre
DTA_2402637_20250717
17 juillet 2025
Aux termes de l'article D. 211-10 du code de l'éducation : " Le territoire de chaque académie est divisé en secteurs et en districts. / Les secteurs de recrutement correspondent aux zones de desserte des
civ3
613721eacd580146773f8b2f
1 décembre 1993
Philippe X..., demeurant à Bayonne (Pyrénées-Atlantiques), résidence "Les Hortensias", défendeurs à la cassation ; La demanderesse invoque, à l'appui de son pourvoi, le moyen unique de cassation annexé
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0304JUD004496598
4 mars 2003
On 23 September 1992 the applicants lodged an action with the Michalovce District Court.