Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII), what is the impact, if any, of the new investigation on the effectiveness of the overall investigation for the purposes of Article 2 of the Convention?

    To what extent are the duties and responsibilities inherent in the applicants’ activities relevant to their claim and the State’s margin of appreciation in this field?  

    What was the outcome of the ancillary proceedings? In this connection and noting the Constitutional Court’s Decision no.

es qualité d'amistrateur judiciaire de la SARL AMA Représentant : Me Sandra JUSTON de la SCP BADIE, SIMON-THIBAUD, JUSTON, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE SARL ABA Exploitant le Fonds Le Blue Whales

What is the current state of the proceedings in question? Was the applicant given the opportunity to participate effectively in the investigation?

In particular, what was the legal basis for that measure and was it proportionate to a legitimate aim (see Aliyev v. Azerbaijan , nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, §§ 178-85, 20   September 2018)?

What are the procedural rules for the notification of proceedings before the Tirana Appeal Court? How were those rules applied in the instant case?

What do you call that? Give me an example? What do we call it, if it is not paedophilia?” Her: “Well, one has to paraphrase it, say it in a more diplomatic way.” My sister is symptomatic.

What was the reason to set the date of 10 May? ...

For us, on the other hand, it is not what is lawful that should be the starting point in our struggle, but what is legal.

  What he has alleged about the 87,000 SEK, is not probable.

And he studied what the supposed gas chambers in Germany at some point in the nineteen eighties – what remains of the supposed gas chambers, the crematoria Birkenau-Auschwitz for instance – and his conclusion

It is unclear on what grounds he did it and until when his stay was initially authorised and by what authority.

If not, in what way are asylum seekers meant to obtain such essentials?   3.

If not, in what way are asylum seekers meant to obtain such essentials?   3.

This doctrine, in particular the test of what was in the applicant’s best interests, was still developing at the time of the applicant’s detention.

          Furthermore, the applicant submits that what is of primary importance in assessing this risk is what happened to him in Lebanon, and not what he told the

The Government had not submitted any explanation as to what happened to him after the abduction.

Those who had already a right to a pension were lucky, but what should the others do?

In cases relating to civil status, what is at stake for the applicant is also a relevant consideration and special diligence is required in view of the possible consequences which the excessive length