THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT Alleged violation of Article 3 of the Convention 20.

On 9 September 2020 the Public Defender wrote to the General Prosecutor’s Office enquiring about the progress of the investigation into the alleged incident. 7 .

Mr Bekos alleged that he was ill-treated both at the time of his arrest and while being taken to his cell.

He alleged that he has been incited by the police to do so. The court found the applicant guilty of drug sale and of illegal drug possession.

    There continue to be other individual cases relating to alleged violations of Articles 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 13 of the Convention, among others.

The remaining five alleged that that they had been dismissed for their knowledge of the sexual harassment.

    The alleged ill-treatment 5.

Official inquiry into the alleged ill-treatment 18 .

    The first applicant’s alleged ill-treatment and the related investigation 1.

    Has the applicants’ mental suffering in connection with the disappearance of their close relatives and the authorities’ alleged indifference in that respect and alleged failure to conduct

Preliminary objection rejected (ratione materiae);Violation of Art. 6-1 due to lack of fair hearing;Violation of Art. 6-1 because of right of access to court;No violation of Art. 6-1 due to alleged lack

#Action for failure to act — State aid — Supply of timber — Preliminary examination of an alleged State aid granted by the German authorities in the form of contracts for the supply of timber — Commission

    He alleged that there were bugs and rats in the cell. 21.

before it, and that there is no causal link between the excessive length of the proceedings and the damage alleged.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 § 1 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION 8.

The decree extended the competence of the Compensation Commission to the examination of other complaints, such as alleged restriction of the right of detainees to correspondence in a language other than

The decree extended the competence of the Compensation Commission to the examination of other complaints, such as alleged restriction of the right of detainees to correspondence in a language other than

Nor did it identify the alleged perpetrators or establish Ramzan Kukuyev’s whereabouts.

Thus, there is no ground for believing that the Swedish courts or the Chancellor of Justice would refuse to consider the alleged violations invoked in the present case.