CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002196193
28 février 1996
It further held that:   [Dutch]         "Het ging om de administratie van een aantal nauw met elkaar       verweven b.v.'
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906JUD002006117
6 septembre 2022
Türkiye 24/01/2020 Mehmet BARUT 27/03/1987 Esra BARUT 09/10/1989 Elkan ALBAYRAK Ordinary judge or public prosecutor Ordinary judge or public prosecutor    
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0307DEC004384498
7 mars 2000
[T]orture... continues to be reported almost (if not) daily in the context of the ongoing conflict between the security forces and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) fighting for an independent
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD002059408
20 janvier 2011
connections to the authorities and the military and she was afraid that he had told the Sri   Lankan authorities about her five years between 1988 and 1994 as a soldier for the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0508REP001316387
8 mai 1990
Fire was also exchanged between a Tamil separatist group, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE or Tamil Tigers), and navy personnel, who used the bus passengers as shields.   20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0902DEC000859404
2 septembre 2008
The main problem in Sri Lanka concerned the conflict between the Government and the Liberation Tamil Tigers of Eelam (LTTE).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0531JUD004117808
31 mai 2011
the United Kingdom on 7 November 2000 and on that date claimed asylum on the ground that he feared persecution by the Sri Lankan army on account of his involvement with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0119JUD000872507
19 janvier 2017
Bulgaria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 2 February 2007 by a Bulgarian national, Ms   Elka
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0827JUD001755090
27 août 1992
was searched for three times and arrested twice, following attacks on Sri Lankan and Indian military camps; that because he had taken part in the election campaign of a candidate of the EROS movement [Eelam
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD001635406
13 janvier 2011
Elkaim, a lawyer practising in Lausanne. The Swiss Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr F.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0930DEC004558299
30 septembre 2003
    The child and the parent who does not have custody are entitled to have access to each other ( omgang met elkaar ). 2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1016DEC001856091
16 octobre 1992
        Les requérantes soutiennent qu'en raison de leur sympathie active pour le mouvement des "Tigres libérateurs de l'Eelam tamoule", elles risquaient en cas de retour
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD006668316
8 juillet 2025
  Türkiye 13/10/2021 Akın DOMBAYCI 1975 Uşak Turkish Elkan ALBAYRAK   59124/21 Karagöz v.   Türkiye 26/11/2021 Mustafa KARAGÖZ 1974 Ankara Turkish     60036/21 Güleryüz v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0407REP001853591
7 avril 1993
en de erkenning hebben slechts gevolg,       indien de moeder en de man die het kind erkent, binnen       een jaar na de geboorte van het kind met elkander
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1125DEC002366002
25 novembre 2004
  The child and the parent who does not have custody are entitled to have access to each other ( omgang met elkaar ). 2.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD001529709
13 décembre 2011
En 2001, alors qu’elle habitait à Modara (Colombo), elle fut arrêtée et interrogée par la police au sujet d’éventuels liens avec le mouvement des Tigres de libération de l’Eelam («   LTTE   »
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0304DEC001408488
4 mars 1991
particular the exchange of information between the services, i.e. the CID and the BVD, is provided for in Article I, 3, which reads:   (Dutch)   "De inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten verlenen elkaar
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1024DEC003204096
24 octobre 2000
  The child and the parent who has not been appointed as guardian are entitled to have access to each other (omgang met elkaar).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1202DEC001566602
2 décembre 2004
The child and the parent who does not have custody are entitled to have access to each other ( omgang met elkaar ). 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0601JUD004558299
1 juin 2004
    The child and the parent who does not have custody are entitled to have access to each other [ omgang met elkaar ]. 2.
Page 27 sur 28
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.