CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2307522-2486304
1 avril 2008
It held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-985007-1016859
14 juin 2004
We hope that this will reach a wider range of government officials, judges, lawyers and academics, who will in turn help to establish a more comprehensive understanding of the Convention and its practical
ECLI:CEDH:003-857441-879249
17 octobre 2003
today in Strasbourg, Mr Wildhaber said: “I hope the idea of an annual European Day of Civil Justice, born out of collaboration between the Council of Europe and the European Union’s Commission, will help
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68074-68542
31 août 1999
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
ECLI:CEDH:003-68385-68853
13 février 2001
It dismissed the Government’s preliminary objection and held that: there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights, taken together
ECLI:CEDH:003-703661-712628
5 mars 2003
In its Chamber judgment of 15 July 2002 the Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 3 (c).
ECLI:CEDH:003-1322641-1391898
3 mai 2005
The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in these two cases.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1018812-1055207
8 juin 2004
Finding that the applicant’s deprivation of liberty was not “lawful”, the court held, by five votes to two, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1398341-1460001
12 juillet 2005
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
ECLI:CEDH:003-68224-68692
10 octobre 2000
A hearing was held on 14 March 2000.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2185274-2334823
22 novembre 2007
a pamphlet in the course of an election campaign, the content of which was held to be defamatory by the French courts.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2223122-2379647
8 janvier 2008
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the ill-treatment
ECLI:CEDH:003-1834845-1925281
8 novembre 2006
They also relied on the Land Registration Act 1925, which provided that, after the expiry of the 12-year period, the registered owner held the land in trust for the squatter.
ECLI:CEDH:003-3270671-3663172
28 septembre 2010
In a judgment of 10 November 2009, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.
ECLI:CEDH:003-68270-68738
28 septembre 2000
It held that the judgment in itself constituted just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage 1.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1876234-1979335
21 décembre 2006
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC001856819
28 septembre 2021
According to the applicant’s father, none of his children had held a Tazkira. 7.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2255582-2415886
7 février 2008
It therefore held unanimously there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113573
13 septembre 2012
It also noted that the applicant had been warned that the hearing could be held in his absence.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2809414-3077442
23 juillet 2009
The soldiers started beating him while Khizir called for help. A neighbour approached but could not get close to Khizir because the soldiers started firing over the heads of the crowd.
Page 27 sur 2571