CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2063
15 mai 2012
arrival in respondent State: deportation would constitute a violation Facts – In 2007 the first two applicants, a married couple of Kurdish and Persian origin, sought asylum in Sweden after leaving
Page 27 sur 1642
ECLI:CEDH:002-4250
20 juillet 2004
The applicants’ witnesses, who were other detainees at the police station, had stated that he had displayed signs of having been hit when leaving the police station.
Chambre 10
69a3db36cdc6046d471d0f5c
2 avril 2025
La SA CREDIT MUTUEL LEASING a régulièrement déclaré sa créance le 3 octobre 2023 puis le 31 janvier 2024 pour un montant de 27 285,53 euros.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0719JUD005961900
19 juillet 2007
In particular, he was not allowed to leave the ARC, save for the purpose of leaving the country, and was subjected to an overall strict disciplinary regime.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0118JUD004203998
18 janvier 2005
17 January 1997, the High Court ordered that the orders be quashed, inter alia , as the magistrates had failed to conduct a proper or any enquiry into his means or an enquiry into his circumstances leading
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD000601812
20 octobre 2016
In the leading case of Barta and Drajkó v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0117JUD005949714
17 janvier 2019
In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0117JUD003964515
In the leading case of Barta and Drajkó v. Hungary, no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0221JUD002481617
21 février 2019
In the leading case of Yevdokimov and Others v. Russia, nos.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0711JUD003779018
11 juillet 2019
In the leading cases of Kharchenko v. Ukraine (no. 40107/02, 10 February 2011) and Ignatov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD007334114
16 janvier 2020
In the leading case of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0730JUD004701215
30 juillet 2020
In the leading case of Fil LLC v. Armenia (no. 18526/13, 31 January 2019), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0924JUD001450315
24 septembre 2020
In the leading case of Vlad and Others v. Romania, nos.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1114JUD006484410
14 novembre 2019
In the leading case of Krasnoshapka v. Ukraine (no. 23786/02, 30 November 2006), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1205JUD000719019
5 décembre 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0919JUD003670912
19 septembre 2019
In the leading cases of R. Kačapor and Others v. Serbia, nos. 2269/06 and 5 others, §§ 97-99, 106-16 and 119-20, 15 January 2008, and Crnišanin and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1003JUD006547416
3 octobre 2019
In the leading cases of R. Kačapor and Others v. Serbia, nos. 2269/06 and 5 others, §§ 97-99, 106-16 and 119-20, 15 January 2008, Crnišanin and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1003JUD000849019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0111JUD000430612
11 janvier 2018
In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine, (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0503JUD004246610
3 mai 2018