CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

903 résultats pour « Wemaere »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1212DEC003404596

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2000

12 décembre 2000

Section 63 provides for a right of a further appeal ( weitere Beschwerde) challenging the first appeal decision.

Source officielle

Page 27 sur 46

← PrécédentSuivant →
TA

2ème Chambre

DTA_2308421_20260415

Administratif

15 avril 2026

15 avril 2026

Par une intervention, enregistrée le 20 décembre 2024, les sociétés MMA IARD et MMA IARD Assurances Mutuelles, représentées par Me Wetterer, demandent que le tribunal se dessaisisse de l’affaire et la

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0717JUD005783600

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2003

17 juillet 2003

the applicant failed to attend the first listing of his appeal on 20 December 1996, this was due to the refusal of the prison to allow him to leave in the civilian clothing which he was entitled to wear

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0527DEC005932916

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2021

27 mai 2021

at 11.35 a.m. that day the police stopped the applicant’s father while driving his car in the city of Akhmeta on account of a breach of the traffic rules requiring his passenger – the applicant – to wear

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617DEC000430609

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2021

17 juin 2021

In addition, as to the contract of 15 October 2001, it noted that contrary to the defect report where the physical wear and tear of the building was determined to be 20-25%, the valuation report set it

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0406JUD001799209

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2021

6 avril 2021

The applicant presented a calculation of the net revenue it could have obtained from the above gross amount after the deduction of all the applicable taxes, wear and tear, salaries for two employees, insurance

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126526

Admin. suprême

29 août 2013

29 août 2013

During the applicant’s transportation to the hearings at the Supreme Court and during those hearings in August 2005, March, April and May 2006 the applicant was allegedly forced to wear a special uniform

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141874

Admin. suprême

19 février 2014

19 février 2014

He stated that, because of his position, he was not required to wear a police uniform. His police uniform had been taken to E.’s mother for repair and was collected by another police officer.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0320DEC007755917

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2025

20 mars 2025

He was obliged to pay financial bail bond, wear an electronic monitoring system, to appear in person in court upon the request of the investigator or prosecutor, to remain in the cities of Kyiv or Zhytomyr

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1017JUD005077699

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2002

17 octobre 2002

    The Court of Cassation has considered that this provision applies in the case of a former priest of the Greek Orthodox Church who continues to wear the priest robes (decision no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321JUD003614011

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2017

21 mars 2017

measures applied in the applicant’s case comprised confinement in a special high-security prison wing and increased supervision of his movements within and outside the cell, which meant that he had to wear

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-938509-966653

Admin. suprême

26 février 2004

26 février 2004

  Colonel D. told the officers that “in accordance with the rules” they should carry their handguns and automatic rifles and wear bullet-proof vests.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1214DEC005526400

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2000

14 décembre 2000

As he had been agitated, the applicant had been forced to wear a straightjacket between 11.15   p.m. and 5   a.m.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0108DEC005837400

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2001

8 janvier 2001

He was given pyjamas to wear and placed in a small cell with no furnishings in the Scrabo Unit, used at Lisnevin Juvenile Justice centre for isolation and punishment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD005414313

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

  17, the court found that it was in a state of urgent disrepair, with a 60% wear and tear rate, making it completely unfit for habitation and posing a serious threat both to the safety of individuals

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0206JUD005906321

Admin. suprême

6 février 2024

6 février 2024

    On 24 April 2020 the Vilnius District Court ordered that the applicant wear an electronic monitoring device and prohibited him from leaving his home during certain hours.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0515DEC003296596

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2003

15 mai 2003

The terrorists wear uniforms too. This is the reason why we left our village.”

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1394308-1455831

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2005

6 juillet 2005

Colonel D. told the officers that “in accordance with the rules” they should carry their handguns and automatic rifles and wear bullet-proof vests.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0419JUD001177308

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2018

19 avril 2018

    In so far as the applicant complained that he had had to squat whenever the cell had been opened or when escorted outside the cell, and that he had had to wear a bag during such escorting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0520DEC000767408

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2014

20 mai 2014

It required him to remain in his home for eighteen hours per day (“the curfew period”) and contained the following additional restrictions: -   to wear at all times an electronic monitoring tag; -

Source officielle