COMPLAINTS The applicants complain under Article under Article 8 of the Convention that their right to respect for their home had been violated.

COMPLAINT The applicant complains that punishing her for defamation had a chilling effect and breached her right to freedom of expression protected by Article   10 of the Convention.

29 (Art. 29) of the Convention.

SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L’ARTICLE 3 DE LA CONVENTION 42.

Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 18 August 2000, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility

    On 12 May 2010 the Court gave notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of adequate medical treatment for his various

    ALLEGED BREACHES OF ARTICLES 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION ON ACCOUNT OF ILL-TREATMENT ON 29 ‑ 30   JANUARY, 6 AND 16 MAY 2003 56.

Remaining complaints The applicant also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.

Relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant complains that the consecutive enforcement of the fines results in an excessive and disproportionate punishment, potentially leading to his imprisonment

    Was Article   6 §   1 of the Convention under its civil head applicable to the interim proceedings in the present case (see Micallef v. Malta [GC], no.

    The applicant also complained under Articles 3, 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.

(Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). 9.

The applicants’ complaints under Article   3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention as well as other complaints under the provisions of the Convention were communicated

The applicant in case no. 54417/14 also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention.

    The applicants complained, relying on Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the   Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, that after many years of litigation they had eventually been unable to

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”).

The applicant’s complaints under Article 10 of the Convention, concerning the prison administration’s refusal to hand over to him various publications sent by post, were communicated to the Turkish Government

COMPLAINTS The applicants complain under Article 6 § 1 and Article 6 § 3   (d) of the Convention that they did not have a fair trial in criminal proceedings against them, in particular since they

SCHOEPFER, Secrétaire de la Chambre ;         Vu l'article 25 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés fondamentales ;