CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

2 715 résultats pour « Bekens JOSEPH »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1893911-1989004

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2007

17 janvier 2007

  Fourteen of the applicants sought a review by Ostrava Education Department (školský úřad) on the grounds that the tests performed had been unreliable and that their parents had not been sufficiently

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68046-68514

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 1999

30 novembre 1999

  The Netherlands Government argue that for most of his stay in the Netherlands the applicant had been dependent on social security benefits and that the relationship between the applicant and his

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2192497-2340160

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2007

27 novembre 2007

It referred notably to Government deals with D.H., a private investment fund, which lacked transparency as no official invitation for bids had been published before cars had been bought.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2228437-2389000

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2008

15 janvier 2008

The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) and that there had been a violation of Article 5 §   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607DEC002201510

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2011

7 juin 2011

before the prosecutor’s request had been examined. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD000164912

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

    The applicant submitted that his detention had been excessively long and had not been based on relevant and sufficient grounds. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0303DEC001363602

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2009

3 mars 2009

title had not been upheld by a court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128JUD004300910

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2014

28 janvier 2014

    According to the Court’s case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015DEC002938811

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2013

15 octobre 2013

given has been exceeded.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0516DEC007599501

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2006

16 mai 2006

  Joseph McDonnell, no. 28035/02, lodged on 1 March 2001 The applicant is a British national who was born on 19 August 1935 and who lives in Skemersdale.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68240-68708

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2000

9 mai 2000

that had not been acknowledged and had died in the custody of the security forces.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1878934-1977959

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2006

19 décembre 2006

  To date, Musa Anter’s killer has not been identified.   2.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1551378-1623734

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2006

12 janvier 2006

There had therefore been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC002593306

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2009

29 septembre 2009

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC001606006

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2009

20 octobre 2009

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623DEC002116803

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2009

23 juin 2009

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0519JUD000918316

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2020

19 mai 2020

been classified as “moderately grave”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0707DEC000805013

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2015

7 juillet 2015

, he had been able to propose witnesses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617DEC007152601

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2008

17 juin 2008

After the present application had been notified to the Government and the parties’ observations had been received – from which it appeared that the applicant had been expelled –, the applicant’s representative

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0610JUD007985712

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2014

10 juin 2014

had been detained in had been poorly ventilated and dark because they had been fitted with small windows covered by a metal grille.

Source officielle

Page 28 sur 136

← PrécédentSuivant →