On 20 September 2003 the district court judge remanded the applicant in custody on the ground that he might otherwise abscond and bring pressure to bear on witnesses.

Furthermore, the District Court had not verified the lawfulness of B.'

    On 23 September 2008 the Yampil District Court (“the District Court”), having examined the applicant’s claim on the merits, rejected it.

    En vertu de l’article 11 § 1, les bureaux fonciers de district sont des départements autonomes ( samostatné referáty ) des bureaux de district. 5.

They were born in 1955 and 1940 and live in Nadzornoye in the Kochubeyevskiy district of the Stavropol Region. They were represented before the Court by Ms O.V.

On 21 July 2003 the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow refused. 4.     Appeals to investigating authorities 11.

    On 2 July 2003 the applicant was indicted and the case was transferred to the Darnytskyy District Court of Kyiv (“the Darnytskyy Court”) for trial. 8.

    On 16 October 2009 the Darnytskyy District Court of Kyiv (“the Darnytskyy Court”) ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention for two months. 7.

Zupančič, President,   Ann Power-Forde,   Angelika Nußberger, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 22 November 2011, Delivers the following

    On 5 June 2001 the applicant instituted proceedings in the Leninsky District Court of Vinnytsya seeking a ruling obliging the company to allocate him money to purchase a car for disabled

CHRISTIAN , PROFESSEUR, XP... 85 MAROUA, BASTIEN JEAN CN... , CHEF DE DISTRICT PRINCIPAL SâNâCâFâ, XP... 39 YAOUNDE, O...

    On an unspecified date the applicant challenged the decision of the Petrovskyy District Council before the Petrovskyy District Court of Donetsk, alleging that the owners’ assembly was not

    On 27   February 2017 the District Court upheld the judgment of 5   September 2016 on appeal.

    On 30 October 2000 the case was transferred to the Moskovskyy District Court of Kharkiv, which on 20 November 2003 delivered a judgment.

On 10 September 1998 the applicant instituted proceedings in the Dzerzhynsky District Court of Kharkiv against a joint stock company “T.”

    On 6 May 2010 the Leninskiy District Court (“the District Court”) of Kaliningrad granted the applicant’s claim with reference to Articles 69 and 70 of the Housing Code (see Relevant domestic

    E.R.’s appeal against the District Court’s decision was dismissed by the Galaţi County Court on 2 June 2011.

    Le 22 mars 2000, le tribunal de district de Baltiisk statua à nouveau.

On 15 January 2009 the Rosenheim District Court, having heard the parties including a curator appointed to represent the child’s interests and relying on expert opinion, rejected the applicant’s request