CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018DEC004428118
18 octobre 2022
0pt; margin-left:42.55pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-17.05pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sDBC81028 { width:4.83pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD005248418
25 juin 2020
Romania (no. 2) (no. 14150/08, §§ 37-41, 17   December 2013), argued that the case raised important matters of principle.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD004835219
7 décembre 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0204DEC000585418
4 février 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1021JUD001675624
21 octobre 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0622JUD007632816
22 juin 2021
  76328/16) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Romanian national, Mr  
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0430JUD003826210
30 avril 2020
'; display:inline-block } .s17E903BE { width:3.01pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sE9B63EAF { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112JUD004748606
12 janvier 2010
Cases which will normally be appropriate for revocation 3   years after deportation include those of overstayers and persons who failed to observe a condition attached to their leave, persons who
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1125DEC003050996
25 novembre 1999
51.86pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:2.99pt; font-family:Arial } .s5E07CC0D { margin:0pt 36.85pt 0pt 56.35pt; text-indent:-19.5pt; text-align:justify } .sDBC81028 { width:4.83pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-108132
2 décembre 2011
.s21B97EC1 { width:25.99pt; display:inline-block } .s35E51398 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt; font-size:12pt } .s5F086C28 { width:14pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172641
10 mars 2017
margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA56BACAB { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s13783063 { width:6.24pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1208JUD004230111
8 décembre 2020
font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0429JUD000657019
29 avril 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD007044513
11 janvier 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127JUD001092116
27 novembre 2018
1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s92F192EF { font-family:Arial; font-size:7pt; list-style-position:inside } .s593C2546 { width:3.31pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0911JUD001433518
11 septembre 2025
Romania   [GC], no.   47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014, with further references).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022DEC004642813
22 octobre 2019
Only where both these conditions have been satisfied does the subsidiary nature of the protective mechanism of the Convention preclude examination of the application ( Rooman v.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2352966-2536637
15 mai 2008
In other words, it had covered practically all the elements that would normally amount to the criminal offence of rape under Article   192 of the Penal Code.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0613JUD000039018
13 juin 2024
sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD007324714
1 décembre 2022
'; display:inline-block } .s7F175FE6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:51.05pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17.05pt; text-align:justify } .sE5C1F6E3 { width:3.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:
Page 28 sur 46