CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC003205196
4 mai 2000
In violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the courts allegedly took a prejudiced view against AJ, JK (or his successors) and MK in the various proceedings.
Page 28 sur 799
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0929DEC004820413
29 septembre 2016
The applicants also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705JUD004304405
5 juillet 2011
They told the prosecutors that they had been subjected to various forms of ill-treatment. 29.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD007791911
10 novembre 2022
; the decision to give notice of the complaints under Articles 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention to the Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) represented
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122DEC000658607
22 novembre 2016
The Court further considers that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206538
9 novembre 2020
Serbia 29/01/2016 Vesna POPOVIĆ 1946 Belgrade Serbian Article 14 Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 5 7705/16 Popovic v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0204DEC001857116
4 février 2021
The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the
ECLI:CEDH:001-112196
26 juin 2012
Relying on various provisions of Article 5 of the Convention, the applicant further challenged the lawfulness of his arrest and pre-trial detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1003DEC002571223
3 octobre 2024
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.
ECLI:CEDH:001-111761
23 mai 2012
They invoke Article 2 of the Convention in this respect. They further complain that the criminal proceedings against M. and F. were unreasonably protracted in breach of Article 6 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113JUD001346122
13 novembre 2025
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.
ECLI:CEDH:001-167616
20 septembre 2016
The applicant complains under Article 13 of the Convention that there were no effective remedies against the violation of his rights under Article 6 of the Convention. 3.
ECLI:CEDH:001-173322
3 avril 2017
They further complain under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214DEC003732422
14 décembre 2023
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated
ECLI:CEDH:001-147568
29 septembre 2014
to appeal against his conviction of 15 June 2009 for the purposes of his complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention?
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0105DEC001398605
5 janvier 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC003660011
25 avril 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD001114616
22 janvier 2026
They relied, in particular, on Article 10 of the Convention. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC003394621
6 octobre 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510DEC004109505
10 mai 2012
The sums would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.