CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0406JUD000543417
6 avril 2021
The Government submitted that the applicant did not apply to the Constitutional Court to review the constitutionality of the relevant legislative act pursuant to Article 140 § 1 (1)(d) of
Page 28 sur 1490
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-117871
30 juin 2009
The Regional Court observed that the statutory provision authorising the assessors to adjudicate benefited from the presumption of constitutionality as long as it was not repealed by the Constitutional
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3217
6 juillet 2006
The Court, for its part, observes that the Russian Constitutional Court is competent to examine individual complaints lodged to challenge the constitutionality of a law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628JUD006530211
28 juin 2016
Practice of the Constitutional Court 37.
10ème et 9ème sous-sections réunies
CETAT:CETATEXT000022233081
14 mai 2010
cassation, à l'occasion d'une instance devant le Conseil d'Etat (...) " ; qu'il résulte des dispositions de ce même article que le Conseil constitutionnel est saisi de la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité
ECLI:CEDH:002-10316
25 novembre 2014
Law – Article 35 § 1 (a) Scope of review by the Latvian Constitutional Court – In previous cases, the Court had noted that a complaint to the Latvian Constitutional Court was an effective
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0630DEC002149593
30 juin 1993
The general constitutionality of such laws may be challenged by individuals, but the Constitutional Court may not intervene in an individual's dispute with the State over the application of laws
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0626DEC002264693
26 juin 1995
constitutionality of this provision.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0506DEC006643201
6 mai 2004
Under Article 1 of Constitutional Law no. 1 of 9 February 1948 “The question of the constitutionality of a law or equivalent act of the Republic which has been raised either by the judge or by any of the
ECLI:CEDH:001-229703
27 novembre 2023
On 15 December 2020 the Kúria rejected the applicant’s request to quash the administrative decision and to refer the case to the Constitutional Court to review the ban’s constitutionality.
ECLI:CEDH:001-230816
9 janvier 2024
The proceedings before the first instance court were stayed pending the decision of the Constitutional Court which, on 24 January 2018, had been asked legal questions as regards the constitutionality of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0823DEC000559803
23 août 2011
courts to look into the issue of the compatibility of legal acts with the Constitution and, in case of doubt, to request that constitutional proceedings be initiated.
ECLI:CEDH:001-202965
18 mai 2020
Referring to the Constitutional Court’s ruling of 4 July 2017, the Supreme Administrative Court held that the constitutional duty of a citizen to perform mandatory military service or alternative
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD002694413
30 juin 2020
Furthermore, it held that the assessment of the “constitutionality” ( ustavnost ) of any piece of legislation was a matter within the competence of the Constitutional Court itself. 12.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:CR01754
30 mars 2016
degré, sur réquisitions conformes, en vue de leur annulation pour le même motif ; que, par mémoire distinct et motivé, la partie civile a saisi cette juridiction d'une question prioritaire de constitutionnalité
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403DEC003456822
3 avril 2025
On 17 December 2021 the applicant company lodged a petition with the Constitutional Court for a review of the constitutionality and legality of the provisions of the above-mentioned decrees
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1007DEC001277187
7 octobre 1987
In these circumstances the applicant had no possibility, according to the case-law of the Constitutional Court (decisions Nos. 4718/64, 531/66, 8483/79), to challenge the constitutionality of Section
ECLI:CEDH:002-6274
20 avril 1999
The applicant companies brought various proceedings challenging the statute and requested that the issue of its constitutionality be referred to the Constitutional Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617DEC005914000
17 juin 2003
On 30 January 1997 the Social Appeals Court informed the first applicant that it had referred a case concerning a similar issue to the Federal Constitutional Court for review of the constitutionality of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312DEC007132713
12 mars 2019
CLI of 2011 on the Constitutional Court (“the Constitutional Court Act”) 22 .