The applicants are the UEDH (“ Union Europeenne Des Droits de L’Homme ”) a non-profit making association based in Nicosia and Christos Josephides, a Cypriot and French citizen, born in 1944

Further investments have been indispensable. 17.

that he had been unable to take his university exams because of it.

Upon return, he would be seen as a spy as he had been living in a Western country. 6.

The refusal in the applicant’s case had been given in one sentence, informing him that M.B. was not close family.

Since then it has not been reopened. ... 234.     On 5 May 2001 Mr Ilaşcu was released...” 6.

Since the 1960s there has been considerable unauthorised construction.

The applicant had nevertheless been kidnapped twice.

    The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 that both the proceedings and the outcome had been unfair, that the domestic courts had neither been independent nor impartial, that they had

    According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

  Complaints   The applicant complains that he has been sentenced to life imprisonment on the basis of the retroactive application of Legislative Decree no. 341.

there had been no violation of Article 11 (21 votes to 9), that it was not necessary to examine the applicant’s complaint under Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 10 (25 votes to 5) and that

The INPI did not grant the application immediately because “Budweiser Bier” had already been registered as a designation of origin on behalf of a Czechoslovak company, Budejovicky Budvar.

  779 had not been served on the applicant since it was a secret document, he had been officially notified of its effects.

You will note from the enclosed copy of the last page of the form sent by your office on 23 February 2011 that it has not been signed by yourself but by a third person.

    The second, third and fourth applicants complained that they had not been made party to the expropriation proceedings and that they had been unlawfully evicted from their home.

It concluded, by 6 votes to 3, that there had been no violation of Article 6 of the Convention and, by 5 votes to 4, that there had been no violation of Article 8.

They have been evaluated in the past, as part of the six-monthly assessment of the EBI, and it has been decided that prisoners should not be searched more often than strictly necessary.

  Judgment was given by a Chamber of seven judges, composed as follows:   Elisabeth Palm (Swedish), President , Wilhelmina Thomassen (Dutch), Riza Türmen (Turkish), Josep Casadevall (Andorran