She is the owner of a flat in Torre del Greco, which she had let to M.   R. 6.

en flammes puis un second extincteur avant de maîtriser l'incendie.

   On 14 June 1982 he bought a flat that had been let to a Mr V. since 1962.   The rent for this flat was subject to control by the public authorities.

He had been expelled from the flat by his brother who was an alcoholic.

    On 13 March 2001 the couple divorced, but neither of them would agree to vacate the flat. 10.

    The applicant owned a flat together with another person, I.B.

    Both the applicant and his son appealed. 21 .

, étagères en bois, pupitres en bois, bureaux en bois, fauteuils, poufs poires, poufs (mobilier), casier, bancs, chaises pliantes, tables pliantes, boîtes de rangement, boîtes de peinture (matériel scolaire

and approximately one quarter share of the flat in Sofia.

The court further noted that both the applicant’s initial mental condition and the unclear circumstances of the start of the fire in her flat meant that an earlier release from hospital had not been warranted

On 21 July 1994 the Head of the Housing Division of the Kraków Municipal Office refused to allocate the flat to the first applicant. The applicants appealed against this decision.

    The applicant has not recovered possession of the flat. 2)     Application no. 66299/01 16.

The applicant is the owner of a flat in Milan, which she had let to L.D.Z. 9.

Article 35 Article 35-3-b No significant disadvantage Complaint relating to delays in proceedings that actually operated to applicant tenant’s advantage: inadmissible   Facts – In 1999 the owner of a flat

On 12 November expert psychiatrists prepared an opinion in which they considered that the applicant was unable to live on his own: he had devastated his flat (all the furniture had been removed) and nearly

not preclude examination of follow-up application in respect of new aspects not determined in initial judgment Facts – The applicant, who suffered from schizophrenia, had been arrested at his parents’ flat

The experts found that the accident had occurred due to the train tracks having been treated with a flame retardant shortly before the train passed, leading to the train being unable to break and therefore

Moreover, the Government had acknowledged these violations and proposed several individual and general measures with a view to redressing the situation and to remedy the flaws in the judicial system.The

Moreover, the Government had acknowledged these violations and proposed several individual and general measures with a view to redressing the situation and to remedy the flaws in the judicial system.The

While in divorce proceedings, the applicant continued to live in the same flat but in separate rooms with his ex-wife M. and their child born in 2003.