CodexAI — Moteur de recherche intelligent du droit français

The applicant was held in detention pending trial for approximately two years and seven months, in Pianosa Prison in particular, where he alleges that he was subjected to ill-treatment; such treatment

Source officielle

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1893886-1988979

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2007

*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

Source officielle

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1477615-1544911

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2005

In a judgment of 10 November 2004 (see press release no. 559 from 2004) the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 6 and that the violation had originated in a systemic problem connected

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-427918-428397

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2001

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant 40,000 French francs for non-pecuniary damage (The judgment is available only in French.)

Source officielle

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68170-68638

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2001

The hearing is being held both on the admissibility and merits of the case.

Source officielle

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120084

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2013

He subsequently left the country with the help of a fellow clan member. The applicant’s asylum request was refused.

Source officielle

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1891560-1986547

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2007

On 28 July 1998 Alūksne District Court held that Mrs Sisojeva was entitled to apply for a passport as a “permanently resident non-citizen” and that Mr Sisojev and Aksana Sisojeva were entitled to permanent

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-861855-884089

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2003

At the time the application was lodged, he was being held in Bursa Prison.

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1913225-2019880

Admin. suprême

8 février 2007

Lastly, the Court held unanimously that there had not been a breach of Article 8 regarding the allegation relating to the applicant’s right to respect for his family life.

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1941989-2048652

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2007

It also held that the length of the proceedings against him, namely seven years and nine months, had been excessive and entailed a violation of Article 6 § 1.

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1912635-2016692

Admin. suprême

6 février 2007

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3 on account of the excessive length of the applicant’s pre-trial detention.

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1954972-2068847

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2007

It held unanimously that there had been a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 with regard to the flat in Beyoğlu.

Source officielle

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2077239-2204146

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2007

The first four applicants were members of a motor cycle club called “ Screwdrivers ”, which was based in Hamar (Norway) and was, at the relevant time, a hang-out for the Hells Angels.

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68408-68876

Admin. suprême

6 février 2001

Estonia, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights. 1.

Source officielle

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2176193-2313650

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2007

The Court held, by 13 votes to four, that there had been a violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the European convention on human rights read in conjunction with Article

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1238279-1289141

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2005

The Court held unanimously that: There had been a violation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to life) on account of the death of Kadri Demir; There had been

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1747706-1832862

Admin. suprême

8 août 2006

Accordingly, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 3.

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1905426-2010503

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2007

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Articles 5 § 3 and 6 § 1.