In the leading case of Karnaushenko v. Ukraine (no. 23853/02, 30   November 2006), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006, for more recent case-law see Beketov v.

    In the leading case of Yevdokimov and Others , cited above, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.

    In the leading case of Obluk v.

    In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Stakić v.

    In the leading case of Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, 2   March 2006 the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006 (for more recent case-law see Beketov v. Ukraine [Committee], no.

    In the leading case of Barta and Drajkó v.

    In the leading case of Nechay v. Ukraine, no. 15360/10, 1 July 2021 the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, 2   March 2006, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Grigoryan v. Armenia (no. 3627/06, 10 July 2012), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 13.

    In the leading cases of Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103 ‑ 08, 22   May 2012, and Tomov and Others v.

    In the leading case of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006, for more recent case-law see Beketov v.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Krasnoshapka v. Ukraine (no. 23786/02, 30   November 2006), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.