may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court.

Care orders were by their very nature meant to be temporary measures, to be discontinued as soon as circumstances permitted, and any measures implementing temporary care should be consistent with the ultimate

CASSATION SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR L'ADMINISTRATION DES DOUANES, CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE COLMAR, EN DATE DU 2 AVRIL 1968, LEQUEL ARRET N'A PAS FAIT DROIT A SES DEMANDES ET A RELAXE X...

The Court of Cassation had jurisdiction to try the case on account of the fact that one of the applicants, Mr Coëme, was a government Minister at the time when the alleged offences were committed.

by the Court in previous cases.

Although the case was of some complexity, several parts of the proceedings had been unjustifiably long, and the overall time of the proceedings, 7 years and 4 months, was not reasonable.

    The first update showed a photograph of the court decision in Mr   Semenov’s case on which the applicant commented, “The first judgment in Dmitriy Semenov’s case.

70 December 2004 Merger and Cros v.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. A.

However, whether such misgivings may be regarded as objectively justified depends on the circumstances of each particular case; accordingly, the mere fact that a judge has also taken pre-trial decisions

general interest requiring an examination of their case.

Brezmes Martínez de Villareal, State Attorney; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT-MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

Hence, the authorities had displayed due diligence in handling the applicant's case. Conclusion : no violation (six votes to one).

Neither had M.P. exercised any prior legislative or advisory functions in respect of the case before the Court of Appeal.

which had been applicable to predefined situations regardless of the individual facts of each case and, in consequence, likely to infringe those persons’ rights under the Convention by their mere entry

of the Court ( Ilbeyi Kemaloğlu and Meriye Kemaloğlu v.

of the Court ( Ilbeyi Kemaloğlu and Meriye Kemaloğlu v.

la base de la cassation, sauf le cas d'indivisibilité ou de dépendance nécessaire ; que l'affaire est à nouveau jugée en fait et en droit par la juridiction de renvoi à l'exclusion des chefs non atteints