Government of the respondent State gave the Committee information about the measures taken preventing new violations of the same kind as those found in the present judgment; this information appears in

This was the      reason the eastern Turkmens were called Kurds.

a complaint linked to those rights and the applicant had raised, at least in substance, the complaint she later raised before the Court.

the event of non-compliance with this obligation (see, for the general principles, Grande Oriente d’Italia di Palazzo Giustiniani v.

Had it not been for this intervention the SGSSI Director would have given a licence to the applicant.

It accepts, for the purposes of this application, that the applicant has the requisite authority to act on behalf of the Church as an entity and that he thus has legal capacity to make property and other

The charges against the applicant in those two sets of proceedings had overlapped to a certain extent.

However, in the future a list of former depositors of the Chechen Savings Bank would be drawn up, and compensations would be paid to those included in this list. 2.

Those interests are, on the one hand, the authority and impartiality of the judiciary and, on the other, the right of the accused to the presumption of innocence and protection of his private life.

In this regard, the public nature of the check might have an effect on a person’s reputation and self-respect.

Those judgments had thus totally disregarded the finding of the Constitutional Court and had failed to fully remedy the consequences of the discrimination established by that court.

At the time, the authorities declared that this procedure would not concern individual bondholders.

;   Noting that this development has been strengthened by the adoption, in June 2004, of the new Criminal Code, the relevant provisions of which allow those accused of criminal libel to invoke good-faith

The Court does not find necessary to address those objections as this complaint is, in any event, inadmissible for the following reasons. 6.

new violations of the same kind as those found in the present judgment; this information appears in the appendix to this resolution;   Having satisfied itself that on 17 September 1998, within the

Basing herself on the case law of this Court, the applicant argued that an objective test should be applied; the Coroner had therefore wrongly directed the jury and this failing had rendered the inquest

been rejected as belated did not prevent the Court from taking those deficiencies into account in the assessment of what was at stake in the instant case namely the implementation of the warrants by the

this is so requested by any of the parties.”

    In this context the Court reiterates that it is not its task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts,   and as a general rule it is for those courts