CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-88108
25 juin 2008
(see Appendix), that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and DECIDES to close the examination of this case.
Page 29 sur 4049
CTX PROTECTION SOCIALE
69dd4847cdc6046d47202319
9 avril 2026
risques ; 2° Évaluer les risques qui ne peuvent pas être évités ; 3° Combattre les risques à la source ; 4° Adapter le travail à l'homme, en particulier en ce qui concerne la conception des postes de
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD003163210
2 mai 2017
The applicant complained under Article 13 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 3 of the Convention that the State had failed to conduct an effective investigation into his allegations
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD003890709
5 septembre 2017
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 16.
civ3
61372278cd580146773fd68e
12 avril 1995
30 et 31 du nouveau Code de procédure civile, les articles 544 et 713 et suivants du Code civil, l'article 3 ter de la loi n 48-1360 du 1er septembre 1948 s'il faut estimer qu'il s'applique aux contrats
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5198
12 mars 2003
that there had been a violation of Articles 5 § 3 and 5 § 4.
cr
6079a86f9ba5988459c4d438
10 janvier 2006
Christophe, contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de COLMAR, chambre correctionnelle, en date du 4 janvier 2005, qui, pour administration de substances nuisibles ayant entraîné une infirmité permanente,
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157455
31 août 2015
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant’s husband’s right to life, ensured by Article 2 of the Convention, been violated in the present case?
ECLI:CEDH:001-118187
14 septembre 2010
COMPLAINT Relying on Article 6 of the Convention the applicant complains that his trial was unfair.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0302JUD003603717
2 mars 2021
Article 18(1)(a) and (b) and to open-air activities. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD008126012
16 juin 2015
Still, the States’ obligation under Article 1 of the Convention to secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined therein, taken together with Article 3, requires them to
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0329DEC000353310
29 mars 2022
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT Alleged violation of Article 3 of the Convention 4.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0113JUD007077712
13 janvier 2022
Convention and that he had no effective domestic remedy in that regard, contrary to the requirements of Article 13 of the Convention. 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1207DEC004407198
7 décembre 1999
4 of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-56379
20 juillet 2004
5, paragraph 4, of the Convention; - held that there had been no violation of Article 5, paragraph 3, of the Convention; - held that the government of the respondent
ECLI:CEDH:001-245398
18 septembre 2025
Under Article 6 § 3 (d), he further complained that the domestic courts had relied on the statements given by L.A.D. and P.C.R. during the criminal investigation stage, and that he had not been afforded
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008DEC007340810
8 octobre 2019
The applicants complained under Article 6 of the Convention that they had been denied the assistance of a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3482, and that their convictions
ECLI:CEDH:001-196830
17 septembre 2019
Sections 4(2)(a) and (b) are derived from article 5.2(a) and (b) of the European Convention on State Immunity.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0213DEC003439221
13 février 2024
State were Article 3 compliant. 8 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC004047713
25 juin 2019
with Article 14 of the Convention. 4.1 The obligation to respect the fundamental rights arising from the [Convention] is directed at States (Article 1 of the Convention).