Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922DEC001661505
22 septembre 2009
22 septembre 2009
THE LAW The applicant submitted that the length of the domestic court proceedings to which he had been a party had been excessive. He further alleged that these proceedings had been unfair.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0629DEC004121798
29 juin 1999
29 juin 1999
When released, he got to know that Akiki had been murdered. The applicant later managed to flee Lebanon.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC003464004
6 mars 2007
6 mars 2007
Forensic examination established that four weapons had been used in the attack, three of which had been used in previous incidents.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC003883805
19 janvier 2010
19 janvier 2010
The applicant company had not been informed of the Tribunal’s request to UWV.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6191
25 novembre 1999
25 novembre 1999
The court considered that this behaviour had been a deliberate attempt to interfere with the hunt, and that the applicants’ actions had been unlawful, and had exposed hounds to danger.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68420-68888
29 avril 1999
29 avril 1999
Principal facts The applicant, Mr Joseph Aquilina, a Maltese national, was born in 1974 and lives in Qormi, Malta.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112490
9 juillet 2012
9 juillet 2012
ATTARD 15/06/1948 Tarxien Louis CASTAGNA 07/04/1949 Santa Lucija John GALEA 10/09/1940 Rabat Joseph Mary GALEA 30/04/1948 Naxxar Joseph SARGENT 10/04/1950 Birkiruara
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC001988502
28 septembre 2010
28 septembre 2010
However, no response has been received.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0525DEC003809003
25 mai 2010
25 mai 2010
No answer has been received by the Court.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2197164-2349445
4 décembre 2007
4 décembre 2007
The case concerned the applicant’s complaint that his trial had not been fair as it had not been open to the public.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0512DEC001484908
12 mai 2009
12 mai 2009
They lastly complained under Article 14 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that they had been discriminated against in that they had not been compensated and that they were not considered victims of the forcible
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68148-68616
15 juin 2000
15 juin 2000
Before giving his testimony, the trial judge ordered the confiscation of the notes which the applicant had been compiling on the evidence adduced at the trial against him.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56152
21 octobre 2002
21 octobre 2002
grounds of sex; Whereas in its judgment of 26 March 2002 the Court, after having taken formal note of a friendly settlement reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicant, and having been
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0823DEC002225408
23 août 2011
23 août 2011
However, no response has been received.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602DEC004429809
2 juin 2015
2 juin 2015
The applicant complained under Article 6 and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the unfairness of civil proceedings in which it had been involved in Moldova as defendants
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55956
17 avril 2001
17 avril 2001
an application (No. 26662/95) against the United Kingdom, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 2 December 1994 under former Article 25 of the Convention by two British nationals Mr Joseph
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49474
11 septembre 1995
11 septembre 1995
Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 26 October 1989 by Mr Joseph
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC001403308
16 décembre 2008
16 décembre 2008
On 12 September 2008, the Government informed the Court that by decisions of 22 August and 10 September 2008 the exclusion order had been lifted and the applicant had been granted a permanent residence
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0519DEC003035803
19 mai 2009
19 mai 2009
However, no response has been received. The Court notes that the last communication from the applicant dates from 14 March 2007.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120DEC001969207
20 janvier 2009
20 janvier 2009
The applicant claimed, under Article 6 of the Convention, that the proceedings in the case had not been determined within a reasonable time. 2.
Source officiellePage 3 sur 136