CodexAI — Moteur de recherche intelligent du droit français

It could not be said, however, that civil servants knowingly laid themselves open to close scrutiny of their every word and deed to the same extent as politicians and that they should therefore be treated

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-567970-570297

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2002

The Court further noted that since a constitutional amendment in 1995, only members of parliament whose words or deeds had caused the dissolution of a party lost their parliamentary mandates.

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68284-68752

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2000

Rules 58 and of Rule 80 were the same and, in particular, that the phrase "could not reasonably have been known to that party” in Rule 80 § 1 accorded with the meaning likely to have been given to the word

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1261142-1313783

Admin. suprême

15 février 2005

  The applicants denied publication, denied that the words complained of had the meanings attributed to them by McDonald’s and denied that all or some of the meanings were capable of being defamatory

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3263358-3638845

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2010

The extreme similarity between the statements, which were identical word for word, gave the impression that they were not genuine.

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2197164-2349445

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2007

The Radio and Television Council ( Radyo ve Televizyon Üst Kurulu – the RTÜK) took the view that the words of the offending song infringed the principle set forth in section 4(g) of Law no. 3984, prohibiting

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1636835-1723596

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2006

  As to the words themselves, the Court considered that they certainly had negative connotations, but that despite a certain hostility and seriousness, the central issue of the impugned banners and

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1637176-1715321

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2006

Even if some of the statements contained harsh words, they were made against a well-known politician concerning whom the limits of acceptable criticism were wider than as regards a private individual.

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3202620-3563719

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2010

Believing this to breach the principle of a fair trial, Roland Dumas had reacted forcefully, remarking to his lawyer: “I   wonder what he would have done during the war”, before answering his own

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2019710-2132144

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2007

x2011; in ‑ law probably gave a hand to his father-in-law [the Parliamentarian], otherwise the latter could hardly have finished ... the construction of the summer house ...” and “one can only wonder

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2311914-2471672

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2008

However shocking and unacceptable certain views or words used might appear to the authorities, their dissemination should not automatically be regarded as a threat to public policy or to the territorial

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68238-68706

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2000

In short, while the Court was ready to accept that there were aspects of the article lending a degree of virulence to the political criticism it contained, it found nothing that would, in the words of

Source officielle

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2177825-2325996

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2007

United Kingdom (no. 63476/00) Woods v.

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1742826-1827567

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2006

  Registry of the European Court of Human Rights F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex Press contacts:   Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15)   Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-667336-674210

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2002

In the circumstances existing at the material time those words were capable of inspiring a deep irrational hatred of those who were presented as the enemies of the population of Kurdish origin.

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2077108-2199558

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2007

appeal to the Court of Cassation The Court also noted that the Court of Cassation had delivered its judgment with regard to Victoria’s placement with her grandparents on 6   March 2002, in other words

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68400-68868

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2001

  The article first contained a criticism of Mr Caselli’s political militancy, which the applicant had expressed in the following form of words: “...

Source officielle

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1531094-1602085

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2005

That statement in itself showed that the judges had been personally offended by the applicant’s words and conduct and indicated personal embroilment on the part of the judges.

Source officielle

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1412014-1474284

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2005

  With regard to slavery, although the applicant had been deprived of her personal autonomy, the evidence did not suggest that she had been held in slavery in the proper sense, in other words that

Source officielle

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2036995-2152962

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2007

  Article 8   The Court noted that the governor of Fleury-Mérogis Prison had decided not to pass on letters from the applicant to another prisoner in a different prison because, in his words,

Source officielle

Page 3 sur 6

← Précédent Suivant →