CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

61 résultats pour « Erich Eicher »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD000580908

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2013

26 novembre 2013

It transpires, moreover, from the preparatory work in respect of Article 53 VCLT and the wording of that provision that in principle there can be no regional jus cogens norms (see Eric Suy, op. cit. ,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0513DEC003975398

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2003

13 mai 2003

display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 39753/98 by Erich

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1212JUD003729097

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2002

12 décembre 2002

    In two decisions of 22 January 1997, the Federal Constitutional Court ( Bundesverfassungsgericht ) declined to hear constitutional appeals by the applicants against either the civil courts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1020REP002705295

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 1998

20 octobre 1998

xa0;               EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS                   Application No. 27052/95       Eric

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1118DEC005410900

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2003

18 novembre 2003

It cannot be excluded either that the judge would have agreed not to advert to the issue of adverse inferences in his summing up to the jury.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0122DEC004866299

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2002

22 janvier 2002

It was dismissed on 11 February 1971 by a decision of the Compensation Office, which was not appealed against either.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC002402707

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2010

6 juillet 2010

In   an affidavit of 22 October 2009, the Assistant United States Attorney responsible for the case, Mr Eric Bruce, stated that, before the commencement of the trial, one week had been spent on jury

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1125DEC003004796

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 1996

25 novembre 1996

;        Application No. 30047/96                       by Erich

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0226JUD007658101

Admin. suprême

26 février 2009

26 février 2009

    Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0915DEC002705295

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 1997

15 septembre 1997

;        Application No. 27052/95                       by Eric

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0622JUD003793115

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2017

22 juin 2017

composée de   :   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, président,   Kristina Pardalos,   Guido Raimondi,   Aleš Pejchal,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Armen Harutyunyan,   Tim Eicke

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0910DEC002157693

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 1993

10 septembre 1993

Eric Rundhovde, a lawyer practising in Bergen.     A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 1996

15 novembre 1996

  He continued that he was    "not aware of any outstanding charges either in India or   elsewhere against [Mr Chahal] and on the account [Mr Chahal]   has given of his political

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD001912402

Admin. suprême

15 février 2007

15 février 2007

    From 1960 to 1979 she worked as a ballet dancer for the Erich-Weinert-Ensemble (EWE), a national company of the German Democratic Republic (GDR).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD002633819

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2025

23 octobre 2025

Tartamella (“the first two applicants”) were the owners of several buildings and land located in the municipalities of Brescia, Perugia, Erice and Valderice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1009DEC001508502

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2003

9 octobre 2003

They are represented before the Court by Mr Erih Fridrih and Ms Sandra Fridrih-Knez, lawyers practising in Sisak, Croatia. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0416JUD003667797

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2002

16 avril 2002

These include an obligation to nullify all the illegal consequences of a violation of Community law either directly or, in default, by providing effective reparation for the resulting damage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0422JUD004887608

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2013

22 avril 2013

Section 19 of the HRA is entitled “Statements of compatibility” and provides that: “(1) A Minister ... in charge of a Bill in either House of Parliament must, before Second Reading of the Bill: (a) make

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD003076508

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

    The applicants, a list of whose names is appended to the present judgment, were represented before the Court by one of their number, Mr   Errico di Lorenzo, a lawyer practising in Somma

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0125JUD006835401

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2007

25 janvier 2007

    The Court lastly notes that the Austrian courts' injunction was not limited either in time or in space.

Source officielle

Page 3 sur 4

← PrécédentSuivant →