decides as follows:                   THE FACTS The applicants, Desmond O’Reilly, James McGurren, Carol Moore, William Moore, Kevin Ludlow, Agnes Ludlow, Patrick

Trevor Brecknell, Patrick Donnelly and Michael Donnelly (aged 14) were killed and six others were seriously injured. The applicant was at the time in hospital following the birth of her daughter.

has examined the application and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet

parentale du fait de l'absence de communication entre les parents et des faits qui sont reprochés au père, - il ressort des déclarations des enfants que ceux-ci souhaitent désormais vivre chez leur mèreet

It was obtained by the Patrick Finucane Centre, a human rights non-governmental organisation in Derry (“the Centre”). 20.

It was obtained by the Patrick Finucane Centre, a human rights non-governmental organisation in Derry (“the Centre”). 18.

It was obtained by the Patrick Finucane Centre, a human rights non-governmental organisation in Derry (“the Centre”). 20.

It was obtained by the Patrick Finucane Centre, a human rights non-governmental organisation in Derry (“the Centre”). 20.

Section 51(e) meets the proportionality tests. First, the impugned legislation is rationally connected to the objectives.

Against that background, the Supreme Court stated that the question in the case before it was whether there should have been more extensive exemptions from an obligation that, as a starting-point, did meet

examined these applications and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet

  Pour le requérant :           - Me Patrick BARDY,    Avocat au barreau de METZ.   Le requérant était personnellement présent.

    Edward Maltby (the third applicant), Patrick McCabe (the fourth applicant), Hannah Thompson (the sixth applicant), Daniel Randall (the seventh applicant) and Daniel Rawnsley (the eighth applicant

Having regard to the circumstances of the case, it found that the length was excessive and did not meet the “reasonable time” requirement.

Both are payable to men and women who meet the relevant qualifying conditions.

Thus, in the light of the criteria laid down in its case-law and having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 49589/99 by Thomas Patrick

:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 70434/01 by Patrick

listed in the appended table and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet

The legislation – designed to meet housing needs - was intended to promote the economic well-being of the country and the protection of the rights of others.