CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

78 résultats pour « Tamara LEJUSTE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912DEC007450816

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2023

12 septembre 2023

Yeraz Ohanyan, their children Kamo, Kristine, Tamara, Syuzanna and Ruzanna and the first applicant’s mother, Ms Amalya Ohanyan.

Page 3 sur 4

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2945183-3256368

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2009

4 décembre 2009

Relying, at least in substance, on Article 5   §§   3 and   4 (right to freedom and security), the applicants complain of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention and argue that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917JUD003505204

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2009

17 septembre 2009

    The applicants are: (1) Ms Tamara Zabiyeva, born in 1937; (2) Ms Eset Kotiyeva, born in 1973; (3) Mr Khamzat Zabiyev, born in 2000; and (4) Mr Belan Zabiyev, born in 2002.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC005794100

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2005

13 décembre 2005

inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Applications no. 57941/00 by Yusup MUSAYEV, no. 58699/00 by Suleyman MAGOMADOV and Tamara

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181356

Admin. suprême

5 février 2018

5 février 2018

nature of operation Information on abductors’ identity Places of detention Any last known information about the abducted person(s) 14/07/2001 Unknown 3.00 a.m. in a house in Serzhen-Yurt A group of at least

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD003076508

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

not dispute, two landfill sites had already been opened in Savignano Irpino and Sant’Arcangelo Trimonte at the end of October 2009, others were on the point of opening in Chiaiano, Terzigno and San Tammaro

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126720

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2013

3 septembre 2013

According to him, at least on fifty occasions he was taken from the detention facility to the courthouse to take part in hearings.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1305620-1361790

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2005

7 avril 2005

It considered that they had been reasonable, at least initially. However, with the passing of time the risks alleged had diminished.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0213JUD004963699

Admin. suprême

13 février 2003

13 février 2003

Tabaka , knowledge manager specialising   in administrative law, Landwell & Partners, Paris,   Counsel .   9.     The applicant attended the hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0225JUD002255807

Admin. suprême

25 février 2016

25 février 2016

) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Armenian national, Ms Tamara

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630JUD001193103

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2005

30 juin 2005

lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Russian nationals, Mr Anatoliy Grigoryevich Teterin and Ms Tamara

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0727JUD002434008

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2010

27 juillet 2010

Tafarra Besabe Berhe v. Commissioner of Police (Preliminary decree of the Civil Court (First Hall) acting in its constitutional jurisdiction of 20 June 2007) 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0323DEC003670697

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2000

23 mars 2000

Tagaras, a lawyer practising in Athens.   A.   The particular circumstances of the case     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228410

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2023

29 septembre 2023

  Russia 22/07/2022 Tamara Ivanovna GRODNIKOVA 1960 Volgograd Roman Olegovich ZAYTSEV                39794/22 Isayeva v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0919DEC005295309

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2023

19 septembre 2023

The existence of the criteria mentioned by the common representative, along with the fact that some of the applicants have provided detailed calculations, indicates that at least an estimate of damages

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD001621208

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2011

20 janvier 2011

This court has no doubt that the suffering on account of the death of a husband and father cannot be translated into money: it concerns just satisfaction so that the plaintiffs may be at least partially

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD005794100

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2007

26 juillet 2007

    The applicants submitted that on 5 February 2000 at least 60 civilians had been killed in the neighbouring settlements of Novye Aldy and Chernorechye in the southern suburbs of Grozny.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0507DEC000375213

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2019

7 mai 2019

Subsequently, between March 2006 and November 2015 the investigation was suspended and resumed on at least five occasions. 37 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1004JUD005864300

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2007

4 octobre 2007

;   In February 2000 Human Rights Watch issued a report entitled “Civilian Killings in Staropromyslovskiy District of Grozny” in which it accused the Russian forces of deliberately murdering at least

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2530927-2757741

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2008

6 novembre 2008

unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 on account of the excessive length of the proceedings against the applicant, namely four years, five months and 20 days at the least

Source officielle