Relevant domestic law 1.

He disappeared later the same day. A criminal investigation into his disappearance was initiated a week later.

They further contended that the applicant’s lawyer himself had been partly responsible for the delay, because he failed to pay on time the legal fees twice during the proceedings before the administrative

in due time.

Relevant domestic law 20.

She obtained confirmation of the latter fact much later.

violated, are groundless since [the applicant] had been provided with a [lawyer], had dispensed with the latter’s services of his own will and had chosen another lawyer ...”

time.

The applicant had argued that, in accordance with the law, the period spent during transportation to the N.A.D. office and the time spent there in questioning should have been deducted from the period

Law – Article 3: The Court was not convinced that the Italian authorities had acted negligently.

    Ten days later the applicant was discharged from the hospital. 24.

At the time of the impugned events Mrs   Beldiman was a high-level public servant with the Suceava County Council and Mr Beldiman was a private employee and a former member of a political party and

    It further appears that, on an unspecified later date, the applicant fired his lawyer and a new lawyer was appointed to   represent him. 14.

He asked that the time-limit for lodging an appeal on points of law be renewed. 11 .

Duca , a lawyer practising in Orhei. 3.     The Government were represented first by their Agent, Mr M. Gurin and later by their Agent ad-interim Ms R. Revencu. 4.

The court further referred to the decision of the Constitutional Court and noted that the exact time-limits for notification were to be regulated by law.

Law :The interference with the applicants’ rights was partly justified by the complications related to the allocation of funds for judicial benefits and the enforcement of the related judgments out of

The applicable law governing the liability of bank managers at the relevant time had not been Law no. 4389, which had only entered into force in 1999, but Law no. 3182, which had not contained any provisions

As a result, the domestic law did not meet the requirements of the quality of law for the purpose of the Convention.

The written judgment was served on the applicant’s lawyer on 7 June 2010. 28.     On 7 July 2010 the applicant appealed against the judgment. THE LAW I.