As a result asylum seekers had little chance to have their applications seriously examined. Moreover, there was a danger of forced returns of asylum seekers to high-risk countries.

Accordingly, the affidavits submitted by the Government were suspicious and could have been signed under pressure.

He also relied on Article   13 of the Convention, which provides as follows: “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before

obtained a ruling upholding his right to have his case heard within a reasonable time, as set forth in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

If they did not comply, the applicant understood that her family would have to leave the neighbourhood.

Accordingly, the remedy which could potentially have been effective was not pursued.

The accused, assisted by a legal representative, and the Attorney General, have the right to present their defence by means of submissions and pleas.

been known to the applicant; (c) After a judgment has been adopted, new documents have been discovered which have been held by one of the participants to the proceedings or which could not have been submitted

    So far the applicants have not received an ownership title. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 20.

The following relevant judgments have been reported or cited by the applicants.

Despite repeated recommendations by the CPT for the numbers held in each single-occupancy cell (9.5m²) to be reduced to no more than two prisoners, the authorities have taken no action to date.

Moreover, owing to the lapse of time since the lodging of the applications, new situations might have arisen: the properties could have been transferred, donated or inherited within the legal system of

xa0; January 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Peer Lorenzen,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

The applicant appealed on the grounds that his offence should have been qualified as assistance in acquisition, and not sale, of drugs.

    In connection with this, the Court notes that the applicant's heirs have not introduced an autonomous claim concerning a potential violation of the property rights which they might have acquired

That decision could thus not be considered to have been duly reasoned. 22.

The Court cannot share the Government’s view that the applicant could have completed the reasons for appeal within the time-limit of ten days.

have complied with the time-limit. 20.

The Government emphasised that it would have been impossible to have the case upheld by the Supreme Court had there been an irregularity in the way the authorisation of the Board had been issued.