CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116865
30 janvier 2013
Lord Phillips gave the judgment of the court, with which the other justices agreed.
Page 30 sur 42
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0125JUD007660713
25 janvier 2018
The sentencing may not be based on a mere suspicion that further criminal offences have been committed (see file no.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0923JUD001589089
23 septembre 1994
Philip , juge ad hoc , ainsi que de M. H.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0521DEC006287615
21 mai 2019
Serghides, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Helen Keller, Branko Lubarda, Alena Poláčková, Gilberto Felici, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having regard
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0325JUD003017507
25 mars 2010
In their view, they were based on mere speculation and lacked the required substantiation and proof.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602DEC003380014
2 juin 2015
Casadevall, President, Luis López Guerra, Kristina Pardalos, Johannes Silvis, Valeriu Griţco, Iulia Antoanella Motoc, Branko Lubarda, judges, and Stephen Phillips
5ème chambre sociale PH
67908b394143037ceabfc017
21 janvier 2025
APPELANT : Monsieur [A] [BJ] né le 20 Octobre 1984 à [Localité 10] [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représenté par Me Philippe PERICCHI de la SELARL AVOUEPERICCHI, avocat au barreau de NIMES INTIMÉE
Chambre 4-5
6618cef47935f50008be3f81
11 avril 2024
MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCE SAS C/ [I] [X] Copie exécutoire délivrée le : 11/04/2024 à : - Me Jonathan ABOUTEBOUL, avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE, - Me Philippe-Laurent
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0902JUD000459602
2 septembre 2010
The mere possibility of there being two views on the subject is not a ground for re ‑ examination (see Ryabykh, cited above, §§ 51-52). 41.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515JUD003897505
15 mai 2012
Zupančič, Angelika Nußberger, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 17 April 2012, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708DEC002551612
8 juillet 2014
Zupančič, Ann Power-Forde, Ganna Yudkivska, Helena Jäderblom, Aleš Pejchal, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0802JUD005427300
2 août 2001
The applicant submitted that the mere fact that his wife spoke French was insufficient to make it possible for her to join him in Algeria.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1121JUD002338009
21 novembre 2013
It followed that, where the civil parties’ pleadings challenged or alleged the existence in fact of sufficient evidence, the reviewing court would reply by the mere finding that such evidence did or did
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000851608
17 janvier 2017
In these circumstances, the Court considers that the applicant’s suffering and anguish cannot be compensated for by the mere finding of a violation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD002305703
22 janvier 2009
While under the Supreme Court of Cassation’s earlier case ‑ law the mere opening of criminal proceedings stopped the running of time, that position had later been reversed, with the result that
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0731JUD004583505
31 juillet 2012
Zupančič, Ann Power-Forde, Ganna Yudkivska, Angelika Nußberger, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 10 July 2012, Delivers the
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210DEC005379209
10 décembre 2013
Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 10 December 2013 as a Committee composed of: Ganna Yudkivska, President, Angelika Nußberger, André Potocki, judges, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CEDH:001-111555
9 février 2010
The Court of Appeal went further (as did the High Court): it was not a “mere error of judgment, but a failure on the part of DC Ridley as a professional police officer to carry out his duties properly
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0213JUD005450800
13 février 2007
The Court finds that the mere imposition of a prohibition on activity does not disclose the existence of “proceedings” within the meaning of Article 6 § 1. 28.
2ème Chambre
DTA_2205475_20250522
22 mai 2025
Par des mémoires en défense, enregistrés les 12 février et 13 juin 2024, la communauté d'agglomération Portes de France - Thionville, représentée par Me Phelip, conclut, en l'état récapitulé de ses écritures