This amount was the difference between the sums he had put into the investment company and those he had withdrawn from it. 12 .

has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and   DECIDES to close the examination of this case.

The applicant unsuccessfully challenged this decision before the domestic courts. She relied inter alia on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU”) in Kalliri .

The Government relied, in this respect, on the Report of the Homosexual Policy Assessment Team (HPAT) published in February 1996.

  Russia , the Court had held that ignorance about how this disease spreads had bred prejudices which, in turn, stigmatised or marginalised those who carried the virus.

of the convention to abide by the judgment;   Whereas during the examination of this case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of the United Kingdom informed the Committee of the reasons

In 1992, referring to a 1974 change in the Court of Cassation’s case-law concerning foundations transferred from the Ottoman Empire, the Treasury applied for those property titles to be removed from the

They are those who back the bullets of the members of the PKK, murdering bastards, and who call them their brothers and sisters. The real murderers are those who instigate murder.

Unlike the position in other similar cases previously examined by the Court, which had all been brought by the accused persons, in the present case the Court had to examine this issue from the perspective

The rules have been subsequently amended, but the 1973 and 1978 rules as described above are still in force and the complaints in this application relate to those rules.

    In this case the question is ultimately a narrow one.

Those proceedings were still pending at the time of adoption of the European Court’s judgment.

The parties further accepted that this status was not one of those that, under the case-law of this Court, called for very weighty reasons to justify differential treatment.

of the same kind as those found in the present judgment; this information appears in the appendix to this resolution;   Having satisfied itself that on 29 August and 14 September 2001, within the

In this regard Article 188 was in accordance with the requirements of Article 7 of the Convention.

Committee information about the general measures taken to prevent new violations of the same kind as those found in the present judgment; this information appears in the appendix to this resolution; Declares

The death of the victims in this case occurred in 1974.

Thus, the remedies provided for in the CCP had not proved effective in the present case. (b)     Compensatory remedy – In the case of Panju v.

The applicants and the Company challenged this decision before the courts.