racial prejudice of jurors: violation Facts : During the trial of the applicant, an Asian, one of the jurors wrote a note to the court in which he alleged that at least two of the other jurors had made

proceedings for compensation for terrorist acts: violation Facts – On 21   December 2006 the applicant brought proceedings against the national authorities to obtain compensation for damage she alleged

Judgment 30.6.2020 [Section IV] Article 14 Discrimination Alleged discrimination in provision of disability benefits to civilian as opposed to military beneficiaries: no violation Facts – The applications

In particular, the Court notes that the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment through his placement in a metal cage took place during the first-instance hearing, which finished on 2 September 2015, and the

The article described Stalin as a “bloodthirsty cannibal” and also alleged that the Soviet leaders had “evaded moral responsibility for the extremely serious crime”.

Switzerland (relinquishment) - 53600/20   Article 2 Positive obligations Alleged failings in the prevention of global warming: relinquishment in favour of the Grand Chamber Article 6 Administrative

  It further relates to the applicant’s alleged inability to examine or have examined the witnesses against him (see Schatschaschwili v.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention concerning the alleged breach of the procedure for his arrest and the alleged absence of a court decision authorising his detention for

It further concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law

On 21 September 2016 the applicant was arrested in Ankara for his alleged links to FETÖ/PDY (Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure).

detention pending trial and during the judicial proceedings instituted against him in Austria;   Whereas the Commission on 29 March 1966 declared the application admissible insofar as it related to alleged

The application further pertains to an alleged breach of Article 6 §   3 (d) of the Convention due to the applicant’s inability to examine certain witnesses (namely S.A.Ş., M.Ş. and L.M.) in person

On 9 April 2019 the applicant’s objection against the initial deportation order was upheld insofar as it concerned the first deportation ground, as the alleged risk to public order was considered to be

Greece [GC] - 28802/95 Judgment 21.1.1999 Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Alleged secret surveillance of Jehovah’s Witnesses: struck out   Article 9 Article 9-1 Freedom of religion

It further pertains to the alleged failure to inform the applicants of his basic rights prior to those investigative measures (see, mutatis mutandis , Hakan Duman v.

  Reine The applicant complained, in particular, about an alleged ill-treatment during police detention, the alleged lack of prompt and thorough investigation in that regard and about the alleged

  23563/07, §§   69-73, ECHR 2012), has there been a violation of Article   6 §   1 on account of the alleged length of those proceedings?   2.

The application concerns the alleged unlawfulness and length of the applicant’s detention on remand (Article 5 §§ 1 (c) and 3 of the Convention), lack of speedy judicial review of his detention (Article