CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2352581-2520673
15 mai 2008
Principal facts The applicants, Mikhail Vladimirovich Dedovskiy, Alexandr Mikhaylovich Matrosov, Viktor Viktorovich Vidin, Stanislav Lvovich Bukhman, Igor Anatolyevich Kolpakov, Dmitriy
Page 31 sur 58
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3051269-3388605
12 mars 2010
In 1998, while serving as district prosecutor in Motyguino, he was charged with the rape of a 17-year-old girl.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0430DEC005490021
30 avril 2025
The villas are formally owned by Mr Alessandro Bandito (the second applicant), Mr Carlo Augusto Francesco Ceffa (the third applicant), and Mr Stefano Raffaelli (the eight applicant). 3.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0729JUD003681397
29 juillet 2004
Scordino brought proceedings against the District Council and the cooperative in the Reggio di Calabria Court of Appeal. 20.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006JUD004109005
6 octobre 2015
Le 19 août 2014, le tribunal du district Babininski de la région de Kaluga reconduisit la détention provisoire du requérant sans préciser les motifs de la prolongation. 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0121JUD001157808
21 janvier 2016
On 19 July 2007 the District Court dismissed the applicant’s claim on the same grounds as those relied on by the head of the commission.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD003536804
10 mai 2012
On 21 July 2003 the Basmannyj District Court of Moscow dismissed the applicant’s claim without consideration on the merits. Referring to Ruling no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD002885911
11 décembre 2014
La deuxième requérante, M me Alexandra Krejzová, est née en 1980 et réside à Prague. A. Requête introduite par M me Šárka Dubská 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0627JUD001164320
27 juin 2023
The case was referred to the Šiauliai District Court for examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0329JUD007271301
29 mars 2005
On 3 March 2000 the Minsky District Court of Kyiv allowed her claims in part and ordered The Day to pay Ms Vitrenko UAH 2,000 [1] in compensation for non-pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0313JUD000560504
13 mars 2012
Two weeks later Ms S. sought leave with the District Court for the applicant to appear in court. 38.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD001124412
20 septembre 2018
On 5 February 2010 the Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal and upheld the decision of the District Court. 53.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD004476908
The applicant submitted before the District Court that the application was unsubstantiated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD003180506
17 avril 2012
On 8 February 2006 the Court of Appeal upheld the Yasamal District Court’s decision of 26 January 2006. C. The civil proceedings 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0220JUD002674605
20 février 2014
On 28 February 2006 the Butyrskiy District Court declined jurisdiction in favour of the Tverskoy District Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD004197011
26 juin 2014
The District Court ordered the prosecutor to take measures in order to rectify the situation complained of. 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0922JUD001243611
22 septembre 2015
On an unspecified date the City Court forwarded it to the District Court for processing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412DEC001144309
12 avril 2018
xa0; 24/11/2011 28/09/2012 10 months and 5 days 46310/14 16/06/2014 Pavel Drumuș 11/02/1932 represented by Rodica Iacob, a lawyer practising in Constanța Constanța District
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0208JUD001086219
8 février 2024
refusal of leave and reasons given Deceased person Judicial proceedings Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1] 10862/19 11/03/2019 Alexandru
CHAMBRE 1 SECTION 2
69d9e08acdc6046d47d98ca4
9 avril 2026
Adresse 4] [Localité 11] La commune de [Localité 12] prise en la personne de son maire [Adresse 5] [Localité 13] La direction interdépartementale des routes du Nord (DIRN) - AGR Ouest/district