of Article 6 § 1 and that it was unnecessary to consider whether there had been a violation of Article 8.

While Lord Justice Kennedy found that if proper enquiries had been made and the results properly reported, there would have been no reasonable or probable cause to apply for a search warrant, he held that

There had therefore been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

There was no indication either that he had been denied adequate medical assistance during his detention.

       The applicant was released on 9 January 1995, after appropriate arrangements had been made.

The matter having been determined by the Constitutional Court and consistently applied, there is no reason for this Court to take a different approach (see Vassallo v.

It follows that no violation has been upheld in his respect nor has any compensation been awarded to him.

In relation to the first ground, it concluded that had the jury been directed in accordance with R v. Jogee the verdicts would have been no different.

  This document details measures which have been taken by the Cypriot authorities.

With regard to his family life, he argued that he and his family had been settled in the United Kingdom since 1992.

These crimes were distinct from that for which he had been convicted in 1999, having been committed after the judgment of 29 December 1999 had been adopted. 24.

    It follows that the application has been introduced out of time and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35 §§   1 and   4 of the Convention.

xa0; THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 3551/08 William RED against Serbia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 3   June   2014 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep

By a final decision of 5 November 2007 the Timişoara Court of Appeal rejected the applicant’s action on the ground that no illegal act had been committed by the third parties.

to order a technical expert report, and that the proceedings against them had been unfair because their conviction had been based on unlawfully obtained recordings of their telephone conversations.

Accordingly, the application to the Court should have been introduced at the latest on 25 September 2011. 17.

  1 to the Convention had been breached. 26.

    The Court further observes that the problem of non-enforcement in Romania has been addressed on numerous occasions in its judgments (see, among many other authorities, Durdan v.

    According to the Court’s case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred