CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0521DEC001040410
21 mai 2013
Italy (dec.), no. 34939/97, ECHR 2001 ‑ XII, and Michalak v. Poland , no. 16864/02, § 35, 18 September 2007). 44.
Page 31 sur 32
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0716JUD001103712
16 juillet 2015
Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom , 29 November 1988, § 67, Series A no. 145-B; Michalko , cited above, § 177; Osváthová , cited above, § 84; Michalák
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0131JUD006122608
31 janvier 2012
Pologne , requête n o 15212/03 et dans Tadeusz Michalak c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1117JUD002403708
17 novembre 2016
Russia , no. 23284/04, § 84, 28 October 2010, with further references, and Michalák v. Slovakia , no. 30157/03, § 206, 8 February 2011). 57.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1016DEC004055202
16 octobre 2007
La Cour observe que ce procédé se distingue de ceux mis en oeuvre par d’autres Etats parties, par exemple la Pologne, la Slovaquie ou l’Italie ( Michalak c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619JUD001163802
19 juin 2007
both of preventing the alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time or its continuation, and of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Michalak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011JUD005269099
11 octobre 2005
For a more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic legal provisions see Michalak v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009DEC002105608
9 octobre 2012
35377/05, § 175, 21 December 2010), and Michalák v. Slovakia (no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0906DEC001081602
6 septembre 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0129JUD004327606
29 janvier 2009
15212/03, ECHR 2005 ‑ V; and Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0831DEC003666503
31 août 2010
Spain (dec.), no. 64359/01, ECHR 2002-IX; Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005; and Andrášik and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108DEC000881202
8 novembre 2005
Poland (dec.) no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23; and Michalak v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0313JUD007299910
13 mars 2014
15212/03, ECHR 2005-V, and Tadeusz Michalak v. Poland , no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0825DEC007344610
25 août 2015
In particular, the Court had previously departed from this general rule in cases concerning remedies against the excessive length of the proceedings (see Brusco , cited above; Michalak v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0825DEC001918610
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0122JUD002013803
22 janvier 2008
Poland no. 15212/03 (criminal proceedings) and Michalak v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007JUD000676703
7 octobre 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0420JUD003801807
20 avril 2010
15212/03, §§ 36-43, and Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 37-44). 59.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0313JUD001658710
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC000046303
15 mai 2007
Slovakia (dec.), nos. 57984/00, 60226/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00 and 68563/01, ECHR 2002-IX; and Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005).