On an unspecified date Mr S.I., the father of Mr Israilov, lodged a complaint about his son’s abduction with the Kurchaloy district prosecutor’s office and the Kurchaloy district police station

  Cooper - On 18 February 1998 Mr Cooper was convicted of theft by an Air Force District Court Martial (“DCM”).

    On 31 December 1998, at its 13 th hearing, the District Court issued its judgment.

It concurred with the District Court that the expropriation of 1984 was legally ineffective.

On 20 November 2008 the Moscow City Court upheld the District Court’s decision on appeal. 14.

The applicant drafted a statement of appeal and lodged it with the Volskiy District Court of the Saratov Region. Having heard Mr Vologin, on 24 July 2015 the District Court upheld the judgment.

    On 28 December 1999, following the completion of the pre-trial investigations, the case was referred to the Tsentralnyy District Court of Simferopol, which on 4 May 2000 remitted the case

Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Monsieur Philippe DE GUARDIA, Président de chambre Madame Florence FERRANET, Conseiller Monsieur Jacques FOURNIE

On 30 March 2001 an insurance company instituted proceedings against the applicant before the Ljubljana District Court for the payment of damages in the amount of EUR   30,93.

of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 25   September 2012 as a Committee composed of:   Mark Villiger, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   André Potocki, judges, and Stephen Phillips

* *** * FAITS ET PROCÉDURE Monsieur Philippe Y... a été embauché le 4 octobre 1999 par la société GENUITY INTERNATIONAL INC.

Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 27   March 2012 as a Committee composed of:   Mark Villiger, President,   Ganna Yudkivska,   André Potocki, judges, and Stephen Phillips

    On 9 October 2008 the criminal investigation was completed and the case was transferred to the Zhovtnevy District Court of Kryvyy Rig (hereinafter – “the District Court”) for examination.

Il fit valoir que le tribunal de district avait violé le principe accusatoire en ne déterminant pas la quantité de drogue dans l’acte d’accusation.

    On 1 April 2014 the Nitra Regional Court dismissed the applicants’ interlocutory appeals, referring to the findings of the District Court. 9.

Le 21 décembre 2005, la cour de la ville de Moscou rejeta le pourvoi du requérant en faisant siennes les conclusions du tribunal du district Nagatinski. II.

In particular, the District Court held as follows: “... Panyushkina M.S.

    On 26 March 206 the Leninskiy district prosecutor in Grozny declined to open a criminal case. 33.

    On 23 January 2006 the District Court remanded the applicant in detention.