CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD002246307
4 février 2020
:14pt; margin-left:48.75pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s30C8A987 { width:4.78pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0910JUD006946012
10 septembre 2020
s71EEDCF9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:48.75pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-17pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s30C8A987 { width:4.78pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602DEC004348017
2 juin 2020
sC79167A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:48.75pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-17pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s4E0353E8 { width:4.23pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0112JUD003634516
12 janvier 2021
  Romania , no. 36188/09, § 21, 13 December 2016, with further references). 29.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD005042308
22 octobre 2020
Romania [GC], no. 47848/08 , § 97, ECHR 2014; Fartushin v. Russia , no. 38887/09 , § 33, 8 October 2015; and Ivko v.   Russia , no. 30575/08 , § 67-70, 15 December 2015).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD006472519
7 juillet 2022
0pt; margin-left:42.55pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-17.05pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sDBC81028 { width:4.83pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0321DEC005442121
21 mars 2023
14pt; margin-left:42.55pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-17.05pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sDBC81028 { width:4.83pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1118JUD004908318
18 novembre 2021
'; display:inline-block } .s7F175FE6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:51.05pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17.05pt; text-align:justify } .sE5C1F6E3 { width:3.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0612JUD002396321
12 juin 2025
The person who had attended the site visit as an observer stated that the applicant’s behaviour and communications had been normal and that he had not noticed any coercion. 21 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0317JUD008060617
17 mars 2022
Romania , no. 31679/96, §   102, ECHR   2000 ‑ I; Iosub Caras v.   Romania , no. 7198/04, § 38, 27 July 2006; Shaw v.   Hungary , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614JUD005607018
14 juin 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0701DEC005867112
1 juillet 2025
:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; line-height:113%; font-size:10pt } .s3970C00F { width:8.17pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sCD82236A { margin-top:14pt;
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1015JUD002565022
15 octobre 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1003JUD002775319
3 octobre 2023
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1112JUD000519923
12 novembre 2024
34pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s54B12A03 { width:6.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1108JUD006395019
8 novembre 2022
The investigation did not establish any other motive, and her husband described their marriage as very normal and consisting of a good relationship.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0406JUD001078314
6 avril 2021
  Romania , no. 59174/13, § 40, 13 October 2020). 39.     The Government’s objection must therefore be rejected. Other grounds for inadmissibility 40.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD001681790
19 février 1998
The second applicant normally accompanied the first applicant during her visits in the foster homes. 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0317JUD002482714
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD001574115
10 novembre 2022
The overall neurological findings were described as normal. STEPS TAKEN FOLLOWING THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT BY THE APPLICANT 13 .
Page 31 sur 46