THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 21.

examined under Article 2 of the Convention. 22.

THE LAW         ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 31.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 27.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 51.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 63.

his military service. 2.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 2, 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION 36.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 33.

The case falls under the procedural limb of Article   2 of the Convention. Medical treatment and death of the applicant’s son 2.

omissions and passage of time     STRASBOURG   28 January 2020         FINAL   28/05/2020   This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention

The team of police officers who arrived at the scene consisted of: 1)     Captain [S.S.] 2)     Senior Lieutenant [M.N.] 3)     Senior Lieutenant [I.B.] and 4)    

argument d’une violation procédurale de l’article 2.

They relied on Articles   2 and 3 of the Convention, which read as follows: Article 2 “1.     Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law.

Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)

Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)

No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect)

Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)

No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect)