CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-482
21 juin 2011
The Special Division of the Supreme Court dismissed his appeal, and in April 2008 the Constitutional Court declared his complaint inadmissible since there was no constitutionally relevant arbitrariness
Page 31 sur 1490
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011JUD003807397
11 octobre 2001
the Federal Constitutional Court.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC004398302
24 octobre 2006
Constitutional Court Act (Law no. 38/1993 Coll., as amended) Details concerning the status of the Constitutional Court and of the procedure before it are laid down in the Constitutional Court
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:CR05205
5 octobre 2016
des droits de l'homme et du citoyen et 66 de la Constitution ; qu'en conséquence de la déclaration d'inconstitutionnalité des textes précités qui sera prononcée sur la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:CR02786
7 janvier 2020
, cette durée était, à l'époque des faits poursuivis (situés entre 2010 et 2013) de trois ans ; que dès lors, l'abrogation, par le conseil constitutionnel, saisi d'une question prioritaire de constitutionnalité
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174731
30 mai 2017
They challenged their dismissals before administrative courts, but in December 2014 - January 2015 the courts suspended proceedings on their claims awaiting the Constitutional Court’s opinion on the constitutionality
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918JUD001078108
18 septembre 2012
He also complained that the Appeals Commission had failed to hold an oral hearing and requested the Constitutional Court to do so. 15.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0405JUD002208009
5 avril 2016
All applicants obtained decisions of the Constitutional Court of Serbia, which found a violation of their right to a hearing within reasonable time and awarded them certain sums in respect
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1105JUD002178416
5 novembre 2024
The Constitutional Court did not inform the applicant of the bank’s constitutional appeal or that the judgment in his favour had been quashed. 5 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0623JUD004656410
23 juin 2015
Constitutional complaint 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0625JUD002245818
25 juin 2024
it inadmissible finding that the case did not raise a constitutional issue.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0428JUD002347215
28 avril 2022
These constitutional complaints were never served on the applicant. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123JUD004152307
23 novembre 2010
First set of constitutional proceedings 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0213JUD005189422
13 février 2025
The applicants complained of the excessive length of the constitutional proceedings. THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125JUD004214917
25 novembre 2021
By Constitutional Court’s decision no. III.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018JUD004956020
18 octobre 2022
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the fairness of Constitutional Court proceedings, because the Constitutional Court had not allowed him an opportunity
ECLI:CEDH:002-12133
16 octobre 2018
The applicant’s complaints to the PPS were dismissed and his complaint before the Constitutional Court was declared inadmissible.
ECLI:CEDH:001-177789
20 septembre 2017
The applicant lastly lodged an amparo appeal with the Constitutional Court invoking Articles 14, 15 and 24 of the Constitution.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5299
13 juin 2002
With regard to the possibility of raising jurisdictional disputes, the Italian legal system did not grant individuals direct access to the Constitutional Court to ask it to verify the constitutionality
ECLI:CEDH:001-242123
29 janvier 2025
The request was dismissed on 29 November 2022 by the Constitutional Court.