Has the applicant complied with the time-limit laid down in Article   35 §   1 of the Convention with regards to her complaints concerning the alleged incident of ill-treatment

ill-treatment of the applicant, inflicted by a police officer with an electroshock weapon, and the alleged lack of an effective investigation into his complaints of ill-treatment.

    Has the applicant exhausted the available domestic remedies in respect of his complaints about the alleged lack of impartiality of the SJC panel sitting on his case?   2.

26 May 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 624/25 Azra CHERKEZI against North Macedonia lodged on 23 December 2024 communicated on 5 May 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the alleged

In coming to this conclusion he relied on the following grounds (i) absence of physical evidence of the alleged sexual attack (ii) the forensic report’s conclusion that there had been no scientific and

FIRST SECTION Application no. 27290/15 Abgul Neymat oglu SULEYMANOV against Azerbaijan lodged on 20 May 2015 communicated on 21 October 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The present case concerns the alleged

Relying on Article 13 of the Convention, the applicant in application no. 30480/18 also complains that there was no effective remedy in respect of his alleged ill-treatment.

– it had also been designed to set in motion judicial criminal proceedings in order to secure a conviction that could have enabled him to exercise his civil rights in regard to the alleged offences and

The applicants' complaints concerning their threatened deportation to Iran, the alleged lack of an effective remedy whereby they could raise their allegations regarding the risks which they may face in

On 22 October 2010 the applicant lodged with the Voznesensk Local Court a complaint regarding the alleged unlawfulness of his detention by the police on 13 October 2010.

Some of the applicants also referred to other episodes of their alleged ill-treatment in Oleksiyivska Prison.   QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

Malta - 17056/06 Judgment 15.1.2008 [Section IV] Article 34 Victim Application introduced on behalf of the applicant’s sister who died while her constitutional claim concerning the alleged breach of her

He also complained of a breach of Article 5 §   4 on account of the length of the review proceedings and of a violation of Article 6 §   1 owing to the alleged lack of impartiality of a judge

It found that “[i]f the alleged violation of human rights has already been raised in a plea of nullity previously lodged with the Supreme Court, a subsequent assertion of the alleged violation in an application

    The Government argued that, by omitting to claim compensation for the alleged damage caused by the alleged lack of medical care, the applicant failed to exhaust domestic remedies.

        As regards the alleged insults committed by police officers in the course of the applicant's detention, the Constitutional Court referred to its constant case-law

(b)     The investigation into the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment 12.

She alleged that there was a reasonable suspicion that an offence specified in Article 160 § 2 of the Criminal Code has been committed.

Information about the identity of the alleged perpetrator is not required at that stage.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 2.