Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Ksenija Turković

Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Egbert Myjer,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

There was no indication that the applicant would not have access to asylum proceedings upon a return to Greece or that he would be under a real risk of refoulement .

xa0; October 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

    The applicants claimed that as a result of the company’s closing down they had lost profits which they could have derived from its operation in the years 1996-98.

      The Court observes that two of the applicants, Mr Dimitar Vasilev Vazharov and Mr Aleksandar Todorov Barzov, died in the course of the proceedings, and that their heirs have not expressed

#xa0; 28261/23 14/07/2023 Radoslav PAUNOVIĆ 1951 27/08/2024 03/09/2024 1,000 30     28311/23 14/07/2023 Jasna TOMIĆ 1968 27/08/2024 03/09/2024 1,000 30     28314/23 14/07/2023 Aleksandra

21535/23 19/05/2023 Steva RADOSAVLJEVIĆ 1975   Pavlović Mihailo Belgrade 03/09/2024 21/06/2024 1,200 250     26199/23 09/06/2023 (5 applicants) Household Marija MILANOVIĆ 1995   Aleksandra

non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     54391/19 08/10/2019 Konrad OPALSKI 1981     14/10/2021 18/11/2021 3,150     54478/19 08/10/2019 Hanna

Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   George Nicolaou,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Victims have to lodge a civil claim within the criminal proceedings ...”

Moreover, owing to the lapse of time since the lodging of the applications, new situations might have arisen: the properties could have been transferred, donated or inherited within the legal system of

He could not have exhausted those remedies by himself.

have been brought against him in respect of the 1997 inquiry.

  6(I)/2000, as amended), submitted that these proceedings did not have suspensive effect.

That should have been included in the briefing.” 55.

In the case at hand, it would have been 5% of the land value.

Firstly, decisions on the merits may have very different content.

It held that the Municipal Council should have taken into consideration whether the building theoretically could have been authorised at the time of its construction.