CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0106DEC004149304

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2011

6 janvier 2011

The applicant company as the defendant in the proceedings did not appeal, and the judgment became final on 16 April 1994. C.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2610967-2839343

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2009

20 janvier 2009

Government under Rule   39 of the Rules of Court that it was desirable in the interests of the proper conduct of the proceedings not to deport the applicant until such time as its Chamber judgment became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD001393602

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2010

13 juillet 2010

13936/02)                 JUDGMENT ( just satisfaction )     STRASBOURG   13 July 2010   FINAL   13/10/2010   This judgment has become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;OPINIONS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-7319722-9984978

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2022

26 avril 2022

Such situations might arise, for example, in cases in which the alleged perpetrators were acquitted and could not be put on trial for the same offence, or in cases in which the criminal proceedings became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118227

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2013

6 mars 2013

(who, in the meantime, had apparently changed her last name and became S.T.G.).

Source officielle
TJ

8ème chambre 2ème section

67f80d56cf40727a0043bd36

T. Judiciaire

3 avril 2025

3 avril 2025

Par exploit du 21 juillet 2020, la société BECAM a appelé en garantie la société MAAF ASSURANCES, en qualité d’assureur de la société MDC.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0205DEC007546901

Admin. suprême

5 février 2007

5 février 2007

(a)     Date on which a judgment becomes final Article   356 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provided that a judgment took effect and became enforceable from the date on which the appellate

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123JUD000790807

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2010

23 novembre 2010

The decision was served on the applicant on 1   July 2006 and, in the absence of an appeal, it became final on 16   August   2006. 8.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1971098-2073178

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2007

10 avril 2007

The Grand Chamber considered that that more limited issue, concerning the right to respect for the decision to become a parent in the genetic sense, fell within the scope of Article 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006JUD004828611

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2015

6 octobre 2015

Accordingly, the contested decision became final on an unspecified date in early 1996. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC003200911

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

    In the case of Şefik Demir (cited above) the Court held that that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703DEC002535710

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2018

3 juillet 2018

    In the case of Şefik Demir (cited above) the Court held that that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1003DEC004815499

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2002

3 octobre 2002

The judgment became final on 11 January 1997.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-78091

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the judgments delivered by the Court on 7 October 2004 became final on 2 February 2005 since, at this date, the government of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703DEC006520610

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2018

3 juillet 2018

In the case of Şefik Demir (cited above) the Court held that that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002DEC004425210

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2012

2 octobre 2012

; In any event that claim shall become statute-barred five years after the damage occurred. ...”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1203DEC003190296

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 1997

3 décembre 1997

  The District Court's judgment became final on 15 October 1991 and the applicant started to serve his sentence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0207JUD002349003

Admin. suprême

7 février 2008

7 février 2008

As a result she became disabled. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217DEC000517613

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2013

17 décembre 2013

The applicant did not appeal against that decision and it became final. On the same day he was detained in the immigration centre. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613JUD000125308

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2017

13 juin 2017

The judgment, thereby, became final. It was served on the applicant on 15 July 2004. 12.

Source officielle

Page 32 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →