CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
soc
6137217ecd580146773f4397
4 avril 1991
Bruno X..., demeurant ... à Roquefort-la-Bedoule (Bouches-du-Rhône), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 14 décembre 1988 par la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Chambre sociale), au profit de la société
Page 32 sur 521
613720bacd580146773ede22
2 mars 1988
Armées, en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 24 octobre 1985, par la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (14ème chambre sociale), au profit de Monsieur André Y..., ZAC Jérome, zone B. n° 7, Roquefort La Bedoule
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC000924604
6 mars 2007
the lawyer who had assisted him in the domestic proceedings, and in his application to the Court, to continue the conduct of the present proceedings on his behalf
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913DEC001044908
13 septembre 2011
considers it essential for representatives to demonstrate that they have received specific and explicit instructions from the alleged victim(s) within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention on whose behalf
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0218DEC003064009
18 février 2021
Moroz to continue acting on her behalf if she died before the Court delivered a decision in her case. THE LAW The Court has to decide whether Mr L.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1469
11 juin 2009
supervisory authority: violation Facts : The applicant is an investment company whose business consists of receiving, transmitting and executing orders for third parties and trading on its own behalf
ECLI:CEDH:002-3384
13 avril 2006
The applicant appealed and requested the examination of the witnesses against him and on his behalf.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10096
26 septembre 1995
Germany (on the merits) - 17851/91 Judgment 26.9.1995 [GC] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Dismissal of a teacher from civil service on account of her political activities on behalf of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110DEC000608705
10 janvier 2012
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on the applicant’s behalf. No reply was received to the Court’s letter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0330DEC002158910
30 mars 2017
On 6 April 2010 the applicant’s representative, Ms P., submitted an application form on his behalf and indicated her personal address as her contact information.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506DEC007593001
6 mai 2003
The Court recalls that when an applicant dies during the proceedings, the heirs or next of a kin of the applicant may in principle pursue the application on the applicant’s behalf provided that they are
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0131DEC002989306
31 janvier 2011
No heirs or close relatives have come forward to pursue the application on his behalf.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245927
7 octobre 2025
that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the Centre for Legal Resources on behalf
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155301
18 mai 2015
On 6 September 2013 the applicant’s sister sent, on the applicant’s behalf, a request to the Zamoskvoretskiy District Court and to the remand prison IZ-77/2 to allow the applicant’s attendance of his mother
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0524DEC000442770
24 mai 1971
His letters to the Commission have been written also on behalf of his wife. He was a pensioner residing at N.. However, by letter of 20 May 1970, his wife, Mrs. R., born on ..
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520JUD005555508
20 mai 2010
It held that from the case file it followed that in accordance with the internal regulations of the Ministry of Defence the person authorised to acknowledge the debt on behalf of the Ministry had been
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0225JUD002935795
25 février 2000
The second applicant had incited his friend to commit espionage on behalf of the GDR.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD002808119
15 décembre 2022
In its judgment it made no reference to the evidence that the applicants had proposed to be taken and examined on their behalf or to its decision not to accept their request. 24.
ECLI:CEDH:001-198536
24 octobre 2019
The applicants alleged that the fines imposed on them for the submissions made before the courts on behalf of their clients breached their right to freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the
ECLI:CEDH:001-202142
6 mars 2020
The applicant was a practicing lawyer and a speaker of the latter and alleges to have been denied the opportunity to use it by an investigating judge when acting on behalf of his client, i.e. the defendant