CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

10 412 résultats pour « Bedhale »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CC

soc

6137217ecd580146773f4397

Cassation

4 avril 1991

4 avril 1991

Bruno X..., demeurant ... à Roquefort-la-Bedoule (Bouches-du-Rhône), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 14 décembre 1988 par la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Chambre sociale), au profit de la société

Source officielle

Page 32 sur 521

← PrécédentSuivant →
CC

soc

613720bacd580146773ede22

Cassation

2 mars 1988

2 mars 1988

Armées, en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 24 octobre 1985, par la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (14ème chambre sociale), au profit de Monsieur André Y..., ZAC Jérome, zone B. n° 7, Roquefort La Bedoule

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC000924604

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2007

6 mars 2007

the lawyer who had assisted him in the domestic proceedings, and in   his application to the Court, to   continue the   conduct   of   the   present proceedings on his behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913DEC001044908

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2011

13 septembre 2011

considers it essential for representatives to demonstrate that they have received specific and explicit instructions from the alleged victim(s) within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention on whose behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0218DEC003064009

Admin. suprême

18 février 2021

18 février 2021

Moroz to continue acting on her behalf if she died before the Court delivered a decision in her case. THE LAW The Court has to decide whether Mr L.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1469

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2009

11 juin 2009

supervisory authority: violation   Facts : The applicant is an investment company whose business consists of receiving, transmitting and executing orders for third parties and trading on its own behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3384

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2006

13 avril 2006

The applicant appealed and requested the examination of the witnesses against him and on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10096

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 1995

26 septembre 1995

Germany (on the merits) - 17851/91 Judgment 26.9.1995 [GC] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Dismissal of a teacher from civil service on account of her political activities on behalf of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110DEC000608705

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on the applicant’s behalf. No reply was received to the Court’s letter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0330DEC002158910

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2017

30 mars 2017

On 6 April 2010 the applicant’s representative, Ms P., submitted an application form on his behalf and indicated her personal address as her contact information.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506DEC007593001

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2003

6 mai 2003

The Court recalls that when an applicant dies during the proceedings, the heirs or next of a kin of the applicant may in principle pursue the application on the applicant’s behalf provided that they are

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0131DEC002989306

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2011

31 janvier 2011

No heirs or close relatives have come forward to pursue the application on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245927

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2025

7 octobre 2025

that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the Centre for Legal Resources on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155301

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2015

18 mai 2015

On 6 September 2013 the applicant’s sister sent, on the applicant’s behalf, a request to the Zamoskvoretskiy District Court and to the remand prison IZ-77/2 to allow the applicant’s attendance of his mother

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0524DEC000442770

Admin. suprême

24 mai 1971

24 mai 1971

His letters to the Commission have been written also on behalf of his wife. He was a pensioner residing at N.. However, by letter of 20 May 1970, his wife, Mrs. R., born on ..

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520JUD005555508

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2010

20 mai 2010

It held that from the case file it followed that in accordance with the internal regulations of the Ministry of Defence the person authorised to acknowledge the debt on behalf of the Ministry had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0225JUD002935795

Admin. suprême

25 février 2000

25 février 2000

The second applicant had incited his friend to commit espionage on behalf of the GDR.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD002808119

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2022

15 décembre 2022

In its judgment it made no reference to the evidence that the applicants had proposed to be taken and examined on their behalf or to its decision not to accept their request. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-198536

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2019

24 octobre 2019

The applicants alleged that the fines imposed on them for the submissions made before the courts on behalf of their clients breached their right to freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202142

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2020

6 mars 2020

The applicant was a practicing lawyer and a speaker of the latter and alleges to have been denied the opportunity to use it by an investigating judge when acting on behalf of his client, i.e. the defendant

Source officielle